Comparison between two different methods for postoperative pain relief effect after Caesarean section.
Phase 4
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and SurgicalHealth Condition 2: O94- Sequelae of complication of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/05/033748
- Lead Sponsor
- Government Medical College baroda
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1) singleton, full term pregnancy
2) ASA Physical status â?? I or II
3) scheduled for elective LSCS under spinal anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
1) Patients refusal and not able to understand study protocol.
2) Contraindication to spinal anesthesia.
3) Severe PIH
4) Patients with compromised renal and liver function, uncontrolled diabetes severe cardiovascular and respiratory disease.
5) Patients have allergy to any study drugs
Infection, trauma, scar or sinuses at site of block
6) BMI > 35 Kg/m2
7) If patient is taken under general anaesthesia at any point of time during the course of surgery.
8) Coagulation defect with INR >1.5, platelet count <80000
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the duration of analgesia between two groupsTimepoint: Visual Analogue Scale score will be assessed after 2 hours of block
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. cumulative requirement of analgesia over first 48 hours. <br/ ><br>2. Hemodynamic parameters <br/ ><br>3. Complications of technique and drugTimepoint: Baseline (just after shifted to USG room) <br/ ><br>During procedure <br/ ><br>At 15,30,45, and 60 minute. <br/ ><br>At 2,4,6,8,12,18,24,36,48 hour