Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05962801
NCT05962801UnknownNot Applicable

Regular Home Use of Dual-light Photodynamic Therapy as an Adjunct to Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment in Smokers

Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: January 23, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Changes in bleeding on probing (BOP)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this controlled clinical trial is to investigate the impact of regular home use of Lumoral device as an adjunct treatment compared to non-surgical periodontitis treatment (NSPT) alone on biofilm removal and host response in Stage III and Grade C smoking periodontitis patients at 6 months.The main question aims to answer is:

• Does regular use of dual-light photodynamic therapy benefit NSPT in Stage III and Grade C smoking periodontitis patients?

30 participants will be asked to use Lumoral device every night before performing oral hygiene for 10 minutes, while the other 30 patients will be asked to perform only oral hygiene. Both of these groups will receive NSPT and will be followed for 6 months from baseline.

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of regular home use of Lumoral device® as an adjunct treatment compared to non-surgical periodontal treatment alone on biofilm removal and host response in Stage III and Grade C smoking periodontitis patients at 6 months.

Lumoral® is based on a dual-wavelength LED light that activates Lumorinse® (exocellular) and bacteria porphyrins (endocellular), resulting in the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS and heat induce a series of photochemical and biological events that cause irreversible inactivation leading to the death of undesired bacteria. This device is designed for home use.

Therefore it is hypothesized that its adjunct use in the treatment of periodontitis could lead to better outcomes compared to traditional periodontal treatment. In order to investigate this impact, clinical and microbiological measurements will be compared between patients who will be treated with conventional non-surgical periodontal treatment and patients who will receive the Lumoral device® as an adjunct to the periodontal treatment. The patients who receive the device will use it every day for four months. Both groups will be followed for 6 months.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
35 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Periodontal disease Stage III and Grade C with at least 6 sites with probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥5 mm and bleeding on probing (BoP) ≥15 teeth
  • •Smokers smoking ≥10 cigarettes per day

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients allergic to indocyanine
  • •Patients with active carious lesions
  • •Need for prophylactic antimicrobial coverage
  • •Scaling and root planing in the previous 6 months
  • •Non-smoking status or smoking less than 10 cigarettes per day
  • •Antimicrobial therapy in the previous 6 months
  • •Immunomodifying conditions/ diseases (e.g. diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis)
  • •Long-term use of medication that could interfere with periodontal response (e.g. biphosphonates)
  • •Pregnancy or lactation

Arms & Interventions

Lumoral non-users

No Intervention

No use of Lumoral device and Lumorinse mouthwash. Performance of oral hygiene twice per day for 6 months.

Lumoral users

Active Comparator

Use of Lumoral device and Lumorinse mouthwash once per day for 6 months and performance of oral hygiene twice per day for 6 months.

Intervention: Lumoral device, Lumorinse (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Changes in bleeding on probing (BOP)

Time Frame: baseline, 2 weeks, 2 months, 6 months

Changes in the presence of bleeding when probing at 6 sites per tooth. It is evaluated dichotomously.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Changes of pocket depths(baseline, 2 months, 6 months)
  • Oral health-related quality of life questionnaire (OHQL)(2 months, 6 months)
  • a-MMP8 saliva concentration(baseline, 2 weeks, 2 months, 6 months)
  • Changes in clinical attachment level(baseline, 2 months, 6 months)
  • Difference in the number of "closed" pockets(baseline, 2 months, 6 months)
  • Changes in Turetsky Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TMQHPI)(baseline, 2 weeks, 2 months, 6 months)
  • Changes in the presence of periopathogens in the deepest pocket(baseline, 2 months, 6 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dimitra Sakellari

Professor

Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials