MedPath

Managing Impact-related Leakage During Exercise Using Intravaginal Support

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
Registration Number
NCT07103161
Lead Sponsor
University of Ottawa
Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of using a regular menstrual tampon or a Uresta pessary to reduce urine leakage associated with running-induced stress urinary incontinence (RI-SUI) in females aged 18 and older. Secondly, the study aims to assess whether either intervention mitigates transient changes in pelvic morphology that occur following a single running bout. Lastly, we aim to evaluate whether participants continue using either intervention during running over the 4-week period following their in-lab participation. The hypotheses are:

Hypothesis 1: Among females with RI-SUI, both a tampon and pessary used during a single running bout will reduce urinary leakage symptoms, with greater symptom reduction observed when using the pessary.

Hypothesis 2: Participants will report high satisfaction and perceived symptom improvement with both the tampon and pessary, with higher satisfaction and greater improvement reported for the pessary.

Hypothesis 3: Both the tampon and pessary will reduce pelvic floor strain incurred by the end of the run, as evidenced by less bladder neck descent, levator plate lengthening, and levator hiatus area increasing relative to that observed when no tampon or pessary is used.

Hypothesis 4: A greater proportion of participants will report continued use of the pessary compared to the tampon over the 4-week post-lab period, with higher frequency of use and fewer reported discontinuations.

We will perform within-subject comparisons against baseline values to determine the effect of each intervention on RI-SUI symptoms and pelvic organ support.

Participants will complete a baseline questionnaire to collect demographic information and assess incontinence severity. They will then attend three laboratory visits within a 10-day period. At each visit, bladder volume will be standardized to between 100 and 200mL, then the participant will undergo three-dimensional (3D) transperineal ultrasound imaging conducted in a standing position. Following imaging, participants will complete a treadmill protocol consisting of 25-minutes running at a moderately difficult pace (rated at 13 - 14 on the Borg Perceiver Rate of Exertion scale), followed by 5 minutes of running at a higher intensity pace. During the run, participants will be asked at 5 minute intervals whether they experienced any urine leakage and to report their perceived amount of leakage. The ultrasound image protocol will be repeated immediately after the run.

Participants will be allowed to keep the pessary and will be contacted 4-weeks after the final visit to evaluate whether or not they continued use of a tampon or the pessary, and, if so, we will ask them to report their satisfaction with the intervention(s) they used.

Detailed Description

More than 30% of females experience urinary incontinence (UI) during exercise. For many women, urine leakage during exercise can become a barrier to staying active, leading them to modify their exercise routine or avoid triggering activities altogether. Beyond the physical inconvenience, urinary incontinence can affect self-esteem, social participation, and mental health. Helping women stay active without embarrassment or fear of leakage has both physical and psychological benefits.

The pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) and associated connective tissues play a critical role in continence control. These structures support the pelvic organs and help maintain their positioning such that the urethra is optimally compressed during increases in intra-abdominal pressure. Dysfunction of the PFMs and connective tissues will cause the bladder to descend during weight-bearing activities, and the urethra, no longer in its optimal position, may remain open - resulting in urine leakage. This form of UI, known as stress urinary incontinence (SUI), is commonly experienced as urine leakage during tasks such as coughing, laughing, and physical activity. High-impact movements like running, jumping, and inclined walking are known to increase the loads experienced by the pelvic floor, making SUI especially common during these types of activities.

Intravaginal products such as tampons and pessaries (reusable medical devices placed in the vagina) are recommended to help manage UI during everyday activities such as coughing and sneezing. However, their effectiveness during physical activities - such as running or brisk walking - remains unclear. This study aims to determine whether a standard menstrual tampon and/or a bladder support (Uresta) pessary can reduce urine leakage during running and/or brisk walking in active females. A secondary objective is to assess whether these devices mitigate the descent of the bladder that we have observed in females after running or brisk walking. Lastly, we aim to assess continued device use over a 4-week period following all laboratory visits.

By evaluating the effectiveness of accessible, non-invasive devices, this research may offer immediate, low-barrier strategies to help active women self-manage urinary incontinence - empowering them to maintain their physical activity routines and support their long-term health.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age >18 years of age
  • Participate in any exercise or sport modality involving running or brisk walking
  • Experiences urine leakage during running or brisk walking
  • Speak and read English or French
Exclusion Criteria
  • No urine leakage in the first laboratory assessment (baseline / no intervention)
  • Currently pregnant or have been pregnant in the previous 6 months
  • Had or have had cardiac, pulmonary, metabolic and/or neurological conditions
  • History of incontinence surgery
  • Hysterectomy
  • Symptoms consistent with urgency incontinence only
  • Experience pain with tampon use or during gynecologic examinations

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Urine leakage severityAt Baseline (Visit 1), and at Visit 2 and Visit 3, which will occur within 10 days of Baseline.

Self-reported urine leakage is evaluated as presence (yes/no) and amount (drops, squirts, gush) every 5 minutes during a 38-minute treadmill run. Leakage severity index is calculated as the proportion of 5-minute blocks with leakage times the median leakage amount per block.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Participant's perception of improvementAt Visit 2 and Visit 3 only, which will occur within 10 days of Baseline (Visit 1).

Participants report perception of improvement with each device on a scale of 0% (not improved) to 100% (very much improved).

Change in levator plate length observed after an acute running boutAt Baseline (Visit 1), Visit 2, and Visit 3 - each with pre- and post-running assessments, within 10 days of Baseline.

Levator plate length will be assessed before and after running under each condition. The primary outcome is the change in levator plate length, calculated as the difference between pre- and post-run measurements. Levator plate length is measured using 2D transperineal ultrasound imaging of the pelvic structures, acquired with participants in the standing position. The measurement is defined as the straight-line distance between the anorectal junction and the pubic symphysis.

Change in bladder neck height observed after an acute running boutAt Baseline (Visit 1), Visit 2, and Visit 3 - each with pre- and post-running assessments, within 10 days of Baseline.

Bladder neck height will be assessed before and after running under each condition. The primary outcome is the change in bladder neck height, calculated as the difference between per- and post-run measurements. Bladder neck height is measured using 2D transperineal ultrasound imaging of the pelvic structures, acquired with participants in the standing position. The measurement is defined as the perpendicular distance from the pubic symphyseal line to the bladder neck.

Change in levator hiatus area observed after an acute running boutAt Baseline (Visit 1), Visit 2, and Visit 3 - each with pre- and post-running assessments, within 10 days of Baseline.

Levator hiatus area will be assessed before and after running under each condition. The primary outcome is the change in levator hiatus area, calculated as the difference between pre- and post-run measurements. Levator hiatus area is measured using 3D transperineal ultrasound imaging of the pelvic structures, acquired with participants in the standing position. The measurement is defined as the hypoechoic region visualized in the transverse plane.

Use of tampon or pessary throughout the 4-week post-lab periodAt 4-week follow-up (4 weeks after Visit 3, approximately Day 38 post-Baseline).

Participants complete an online questionnaire that evaluates their use of either the tampon or pessary intervention during running over a 4-week period after completing the in-lab component of the study. They are asked whether they used the tampon or pessary while running (Yes/No) and to rate the frequency of usage on a scale of 0 (not used) to 100 (used during every run). If they did not use the pessary/tampon at all or if they stopped using the pessary/tampon during the 4-week period, they are asked to share the number of runs they ran with the device and their reasons for stopping its usage.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences building, 200 Lees Avenue

🇨🇦

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences building, 200 Lees Avenue
🇨🇦Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Grace Collins, BSc.
Contact
613-562-5800
gcollins@uottawa.ca
Anne-Marie Lake, MSc.
Contact
613-562-5800
alake@uottawa.ca
Linda McLean, PhD.
Principal Investigator

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.