Evaluation of the placement of tooth implant using three different techniques and patient experience.

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge,

• Registration Number: CTRI/2023/07/055423
• Lead Sponsor: Veeramallu Nageswari

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate and compare the precision and patient reported outcome measures of conventional, static guided and dynamic navigation implants. A total of 45 patients with partially edentulous mandibular posteriors will be selected from out patient department of periodontics  and implantology, Vishnu Dental college, Bhimavaram and will be randomly assigned in to three groups by using computerized generated code. Entry (2d) deviation, Apical (3d) deviation, Apex(V) deviation, angular deviation, crestal bone loss, implant stability will be assessed and patient reported outcome measures will be assessed by using questionnaire form, which includes â€¢       Pre-operative patient’s expectations from dental implant surgery.

•       Post-operative healing questionnaire

•       Post-operative patients experience with dental implant surgery

•       Patient’s acceptance of post -operative healing events and overall satisfaction with dental implant surgery will be measured .

Crestal bone loss at baseline,3 and 6 months and implant stability at 3 months will also be measured.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Last Update Posted: 2023-07-19
• Study Start: 2023-07-30

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Not Yet Recruiting
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 45

Inclusion Criteria

• Age range of 20-60 years 2.
• Partially edentulous mandibular premolars and molars 3.Adequate bone depth and width for implant placement 4.Anatomically suitable for all three protocols (a) Freehand implant placement (b) Static CAIS (c) Dynamic CAIS 5.ASA 1 and 2 classification patients.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases 2.
• Pregnancy or lactating women 3.
• Chronic smokers 4.
• Patients with infectious diseases (HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C ) 5.
• Known allergy to any component of the implant or implant guide 6.
• Patients undergoing radiation therapy 7.
• Patients under bisphosphonate therapy 8.Patients under antibiotic therapy 9.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
4. Angular deviation	1. Entry (2d) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 2. Apical (3d) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 3. Apex (v) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 4. Angular deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 5. Pre-operative patient’s expectations from dental implant surgery at baseline | 6. Post-operative healing & experience questionnaire after dental implant surgery at 6hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th days
1. Entry (2d) deviation	1. Entry (2d) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 2. Apical (3d) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 3. Apex (v) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 4. Angular deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 5. Pre-operative patient’s expectations from dental implant surgery at baseline | 6. Post-operative healing & experience questionnaire after dental implant surgery at 6hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th days
2. Apical (3d) deviation	1. Entry (2d) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 2. Apical (3d) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 3. Apex (v) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 4. Angular deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 5. Pre-operative patient’s expectations from dental implant surgery at baseline | 6. Post-operative healing & experience questionnaire after dental implant surgery at 6hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th days
6. Post-operative healing & experience questionnaire after dental implant surgery	1. Entry (2d) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 2. Apical (3d) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 3. Apex (v) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 4. Angular deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 5. Pre-operative patient’s expectations from dental implant surgery at baseline | 6. Post-operative healing & experience questionnaire after dental implant surgery at 6hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th days
3. Apex (v) deviation	1. Entry (2d) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 2. Apical (3d) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 3. Apex (v) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 4. Angular deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 5. Pre-operative patient’s expectations from dental implant surgery at baseline | 6. Post-operative healing & experience questionnaire after dental implant surgery at 6hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th days
5. Pre-operative patient’s expectations from dental implant surgery.	1. Entry (2d) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 2. Apical (3d) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 3. Apex (v) deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 4. Angular deviation at baseline, immediately after implant placement | 5. Pre-operative patient’s expectations from dental implant surgery at baseline | 6. Post-operative healing & experience questionnaire after dental implant surgery at 6hrs, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 7th days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Radiographical parameters	1.Crestal bone loss

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Vishnu Dental College; 🇮🇳 Godavari, ANDHRA PRADESH, India

Vishnu Dental College

🇮🇳Godavari, ANDHRA PRADESH, India

Veeramallu Nageswari

Principal investigator

6300558030

veeramallunageswari@gmail.com