Open-Label Study to Assess Lacosamide Safety as Add-on Therapy for Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures in Subjects With Epilepsy
- Registration Number
- NCT01118949
- Lead Sponsor
- UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc.
- Brief Summary
The purpose is to assess the safety of Lacosamide in subjects with uncontrolled Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic (PGTC) seizures with Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 49
- Subject has a diagnosis of uncontrolled epilepsy with primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures and idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Diagnosis should have been established by an electroencephalogram (EEG) with generalized spike-wave discharges within 5 years of the screening visit
- Subject has ≥1 PGTC seizure within the 12 weeks prior to the screening visit
- Subject has a stable dose regimen of 1 to 3 marketed antiepileptic drug(s) (AEDs) with or without additional concurrent stable Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS). The VNS must have been in place for at least 6 months prior to study entry with constant settings for at least 28 days prior to the screening visit and during the Baseline Phase. Benzodiazepines will be counted as an AED
- Subject has a history of partial-onset seizures or EEG findings consistent with partial onset seizures
- Subject has a history of status epilepticus within the 5-year Period prior to Visit 1
- Subject has a current or previous diagnosis of pseudoseizures, conversion disorders, or other non-epileptic ictal events
- Subject has any medical or psychiatric condition
- Subject has any history of alcohol or drug abuse
- Subject is currently taking felbamate
- Subject has ever taken vigabatrin and has no visual fields examination report available or if results of the examination are abnormal
- Subject is on a ketogenic diet
- Subject has a known sodium channelopathy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Lacosamide Lacosamide -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in the Number of Seizure Days With Absence Seizures From the Baseline Phase to the Maintenance Phase From Baseline Phase (Weeks 0 to 4) to Maintenance Phase (Weeks 8 to 13) During the study subjects kept a diary to record daily seizure activity from Visit 1 until the end of study participation. The following information has been recorded:
* Seizure type
* Seizure frequency
A negative value in change of seizure days with absence seizures shows a decrease in seizure days with absence seizures.Change in the Number of Seizure Days With Myoclonic Seizures From the Baseline Phase to the Maintenance Phase From Baseline Phase (Weeks 0 to 4) to Maintenance Phase (Weeks 8 to 13) During the study subjects kept a diary to record daily seizure activity from Visit 1 until the end of study participation. The following information has been recorded:
* Seizure type
* Seizure frequency
A negative value in change of seizure days with myoclonic seizures shows a decrease in seizure days with myoclonic seizures.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in Count of Generalized Spike-wave Discharges on 24-hour Ambulatory Electroencephalogram (EEG) From Visit 2 (Baseline Phase) to Visit 6 (Maintenance Phase) From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 6 (Week 8) Subjects were asked to return to the clinic on the morning of the day prior to Visit 2 and Visit 6 to begin 24-hour ambulatory EEG recordings for evaluation of spike-wave discharges. Only subjects with an evaluable EEG measurement with \> 19 interpretable hours at Visit 2 and Visit 6 are included in this analysis. The general spike-wave discharges are calculated per interpretable hours.
Changes in Count of 3 Hertz (Hz) Spike-wave Discharges (During Waking Hours) on 24-hour Ambulatory Electroencephalogram (EEG) From Visit 2 (Baseline Phase) to Visit 6 (Maintenance Phase) From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 6 (Week 8) Subjects were asked to return to the clinic on the morning of the day prior to Visit 2 and Visit 6 to begin 24-hour ambulatory EEG recordings for evaluation of spike-wave discharges. Only subjects with an evaluable EEG measurement with \> 19 interpretable hours at Visit 2 and Visit 6 are included in this analysis. The 3 Hertz (Hz) spike-wave discharges are calculated per awake hours.
Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the 10-week Treatment Period From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 7 (Week 13) An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Number of Subjects Withdrawn From the Study Due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the 10-week Treatment Period From Visit 2 (Week 4) to Visit 7 (Week 13) An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.