Structured Remote Surgical Coaching to Improve Operative Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Multicenter Randomized Control Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 30
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Technical errors made during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the operating room
研究概览
简要总结
Surgical coaching, defined as a constructive relationship that provides objective feedback to individuals about a broad range of factors influencing operative performance, is a key strategy for integrating adult learning theory into the traditionally didactic arena of surgical education. It is gaining momentum as an area of potential growth and innovation, and may become a more meaningful method of ongoing professional development for practicing surgeons. Effective coaching interactions encourage discussion, provide feedback, affirm positive beliefs and challenge pre-existing assumptions. The effectiveness and uptake of coaching interventions in surgery can be influenced by the identity of the coach, and cultural or individual surgeon attitudes.
Surgical coaching has been linked to improvements in technical and procedural skills in both simulated and clinical environments. In 2015, a systematic review of surgical coaching showed a positive impact of surgical coaching interventions on learners' perceptions and attitudes, their technical and nontechnical skills, and their performance measures.
The investigators propose to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial of structured remote surgical coaching (SRSC) versus conventional surgical training for laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by surgery residents at three institutions, in Canada and Australia, to not only provide additional evidence in support of validity and generalizability of a structured surgical coaching intervention for surgery trainees, but also to demonstrate improvement in accuracy of self-assessment of operative performance and the feasibility of remote coaching.
详细描述
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of adding a structured remote surgical coaching (SRSC) program to conventional surgery training (CST) versus conventional surgery training (CST) alone on general surgery residents' (1) technical performance, (2) technical errors, and (3) accuracy of self-assessment for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure. Feasibility of conducting remote coaching across different times zones and continents will also be explored.
Hypothesis 1: Participation in a SRSC program will result in superior technical skills and fewer technical errors committed during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared to CST.
Hypothesis 2: Participation in a SRSC program will result in a more accurate self-assessment of participants' technical skills as compared to CST.
Hypothesis 3: It will be feasible to coach surgery residents remotely across different time zones and continents.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING:
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
Technical skills and technical errors will be assessed by a trainer rater blinded to the participant's group allocation and level of training.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •General surgery residents (PGY 1-5) who routinely perform components of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a primary surgeon (under supervision).
排除标准
- •Individuals with injuries that preclude performance in the operating room will be excluded.
结局指标
主要结局
Technical errors made during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the operating room
时间窗: 90 days
Technical errors during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the operating room will be one of the primary outcomes for this study. The Generic Error Rating Tool (GERT) will be used to measure this outcome.
Skill set during performance of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the operating room
时间窗: 90 days
Technical skills during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the operating room will be one of the primary outcomes for this study. The Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) scale will be used to measure this outcome.
次要结局
- Subjective assessment of the usefulness of SRSC program(90 days)
- Accuracy of self-assessment(90 days)
研究者
Dr. Boris Zevin
Assistant Professor & Medical Education Scholar
Queen's University
