跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02190071
NCT02190071已完成不适用

Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy Between Base and Cover Slide Smear After Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Pancreatic Cancer

Seoul National University Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 73 人开始时间: 2014年6月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
73
试验地点
1
主要终点
positive malignancy rate of cover slides set and base slides set.

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference of diagnostic accuracy between cover slides and base slides from EUS-FNA cytopathologic sample in patients who were previously suspected of pancreatic cancer in radiologic test.

详细描述

  1. background

  2. Pancreatic cancer is the challenging malignancy in diagnosis and treatment.

  3. Recently, EUS-FNA has played a important role in diagnosing pancreatic cancer.

  4. Samples from EUS-FNA are sent to following three types of preparations.

  • cytologic smear (by pull apart method)
  • cell block
  • histologic biopsy
  1. In cytologic smear method, endoscopists tend to send as many as slides, while pathologists want minimal slides if they warrant diagnostic accuracy.

  2. Therefore we are going to find a point of contact between high diagnostic yield and minimal overloading of pathologist.

  3. Method

  4. We are going to enrolled the patients who were suspected of pancreatic cancer in previous radiologic test.

  5. One identical and skilled endoscopist performs EUS-FNA with multiple punctures.

  6. We get total 8 pairs of slides (= 8 covers + 8 bases).

  7. All the cover slides are collected to the bottle-A, all the base slide to the bottle-B.

  8. One identical and skilled pathologist inspects these slide in blind method. (She cannot show the label of bottle so that she does not know what bottle is A or B.)

  9. She record the positive or negative in each bottle. (If there is only one slide is positive in malignant cell, the bottle is positive.)

  10. In these manner, we collect the all subjects' cytopathologic results as a pair of outcome. All the possible combinations are following four examples:

  • (cover/base) = (positive/positive) = (+/+)
  • (cover/base) = (positive/negative) = (+/-)
  • (cover/base) = (negative/positive) = (-/+)
  • (cover/base) = (negative/negative) = (-/-)
  1. Then we are going to take a two-sided non-inferiority test of proportion using McNemar's test.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • patients who were suspected of pancreatic cancer in previous radiologic test such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or Positron Emission Tomography.

排除标准

  • failed smear due to inexperienced assistant
  • loss of slide
  • patients who were diagnosed with other lesion far from pancreatic cancer in prospective confirmative tests.
  • patients who refuse to participate in this study
  • report of other pathologist who are not a previously-assigned pathologist

结局指标

主要结局

positive malignancy rate of cover slides set and base slides set.

时间窗: cytopathological report within 2 weeks after EUS-FNA

comparison between diagnostic accuracy between cover slide sets and base slide sets

次要结局

  • positive malignancy rate of (1) cytologic smear, (2) cell block and (3) histologic biopsy(record of pathologist within 2 weeks after EUS-FNA)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验