MedPath

Different Sessions of Perineural Injection With Dextrose for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Interventions
Procedure: two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT
Procedure: One-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT
Procedure: Placebo ultrasound-guided injection with nerve hydrodissection
Registration Number
NCT03802435
Lead Sponsor
Tri-Service General Hospital
Brief Summary

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy with involving compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel. The technique of perineural injection therapy (PIT) by using 5% dextrose (D5W) is now commonly used for peeling the nerve from surrounding soft tissue (called nerve hydrodissection), which may help antineurogenic inflammation, allow the impulse to pass, and rescue the nerve with ischemic damage. However, the evidence and reference of PIT and nerve hydrodissection are very seldom until our series researches since 2017. Moreover, our research revealed PIT with D5W is more beneficial than that of corticosteroid in patients with mild-to-moderate CTS at 4 to 6 months postinjection. However, the accumulative effect and long-term effect (more than 6 months) of PIT is still unknown. Hence, we design a randomized, double- blind, controlled trail to assess the long-term effect of ultrasound-guided PIT in patients with CTS. The aim one is to survey the possible accumulative effect of different sessions of PIT (6 months follow-up) and aim two is to evaluate the long-term effect and safety of PIT (one year follow-up).

Detailed Description

After obtaining written informed consent, patients clinically diagnosed with mild-to-moderate CTS were includes and randomized into three groups. Group A, patients received two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc D5W (3 months interval); Group B, patients received one-session of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc D5W and 5cc normal saline separately (3 months interval); Group C (control group), patients received two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with nerve hydrodissection with 10cc normal saline. The primary outcome is Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) and secondary outcomes include visual analog scale (VAS), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve, nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve, and Global assessment of treatment. The evaluations were performed pretreatment as well as on the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after first injection.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age between 20-80 year-old.
  • Diagnosis was confirmed using an electrophysiological study
Exclusion Criteria
  • Cancer
  • Coagulopathy
  • Pregnancy
  • Inflammation status
  • Cervical radiculopathy
  • Polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy
  • Thoracic outlet syndrome
  • Previously undergone wrist surgery or steroid injection for CTS

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Two-sessions of ultrasound-guided PITtwo-sessions of ultrasound-guided PITtwo-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc 5% dextrose (3 months interval)
One-session of ultrasound-guided PITOne-sessions of ultrasound-guided PITone-session of ultrasound-guided PIT with 10cc 5% dextrose and 10cc normal saline separately (3 months interval)
Two-session of ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissectionPlacebo ultrasound-guided injection with nerve hydrodissectiontwo-sessions of ultrasound-guided PIT with nerve hydrodissection with 10cc normal saline (3 months interval).
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline of severity of symptoms and functional status on 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injectionPre-treatment, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection

Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire (BCTQ) is a frequently used patient-based questionnaire for measurement of CTS which encompasses two components. In total, 11 questions and 8 items were evaluated to rate the symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional status scale (FSS), respectively. Both subscales range from 1 to 5 with a higher score indicating a higher degree of disability. The mean of total SSS and FSS divided with each item score were used for further analysis.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline of electrophysiological measurement on 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injectionPre-treatment, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection

Antidromic sensory nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment.

Change from baseline of cross-sectional area of the median nerve on 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injectionPre-treatment, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection

Using the musculoskeletal sonogram to measure the cross-sectional area of the median nerve before treatment and multiple time frame after treatment.

Change from baseline of pain on 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injectionPre-treatment, 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th month and one year after injection

Digital pain severity or paresthesia/dysthesia was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS). Pain score scale ranged from 0 to 10, with 10 indicating the most severe pain.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital

🇨🇳

Taipei, Neihu District, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath