Development of a Medical Device Utilizing an EEG-Based Algorithm for the Objective Quantification of Pain
Completed
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Registration Number
- NCT03998007
- Lead Sponsor
- PainQx, Inc
- Brief Summary
Obtained 19 lead EEG data from 50 chronic pain patients along with their clinical history and self-reported pain scored. Machine learning was used to analyze the EEG data and derive a chronic pain biomarker.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
Inclusion Criteria
- Male and female chronic pain patients
- Patients between the ages of 18-85 years
- Patients exhibiting the presence of symptoms in excess of 3 months duration
- Patients suffering from neuropathic (e.g., lower back pain), osteoarthritis, or muscular skeletal pain
- Patients with evidence of pathology related to the painful condition on which diagnosis was made (e.g., results of imaging or diagnostic pain code)
- Patients with NRS pain scores across the full range (1-10) at the time of testing
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with medically diagnosed psychotic illness
- Patients with medically diagnosed drug or alcohol dependence in the past 12 months
- Patients with a medical history of head injury with loss of consciousness and amnesia (within the last 2 years)
- Patients with skull abnormalities that preclude the proper placement of the electrodes for the EEG data acquisition
- Patients who have a spinal cord stimulator, or other implantable devices
- Patients for whom the source of pain at the time of the evaluation is associated with: neurological disorders (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson, dementia), diabetes, migraines, or those with reflex / sympathetic dystrophy disorder/complex regional pain syndrome, fibromyalgia, or visceral pain
- Patients with cancer
- Patients on workers compensation or disability
- Patient on anticonvulsant medication
- Patients who have a history of seizures
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pearsons Correlation between IRIS derived pain biomarker and patient reported Numeric Rating Scale (0-10) 6 Months A Pearson Correlation of 1.0 is perfection correlation and 0 no correlation between the two measured variables
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Boston Pain Care Center
🇺🇸Waltham, Massachusetts, United States