MedPath

Primary and Secondary Ventral Hernia Repair Using Long-term Resorbable Versus Non-resorbable Large Pore Synthetic Mesh.

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Primary and Secondary Ventral Hernia
Interventions
Procedure: Non-resorbable synthetic mesh.
Procedure: Placing the resorbable mesh
Registration Number
NCT01622725
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Ghent
Brief Summary

Since abdominal wall hernia repair is currently performed with the use of a mesh, side effects associated with the mesh are frequently reported during long term follow-up. These side effects are related to shrinkage of the mesh, adhesions to the bowl, pain, and inflammation of the skin and bowl. To reduce or prevent these effects, a fully resorbing mesh has been developed, which provides sufficient support and strength to allow efficient recovery of the abdominal wall, but also disappear from your body in three years time, so that you no longer have any synthetic material in your body. Previous resorbing meshes also disappeared but over a much shorter period of time, so that the hernia was insufficiently healed, with recurrence as a result.

The TIGRβ„’ mesh (the resorbable mesh used in the study) is in principle a synthetic mesh, made of two commonly used polymers, however it will retain 50% of its initial strength after six months. This in theory is enough to provide support of the collagen healing process during the initial wound-healing phase, but also to support the transition of initial collagen to functional collagen.

The aim of this study is to compare TIGRβ„’ with large pore mesh used in the repair of the anterior abdominal wall repair (incisional hernia, umbilical hernia, etc..Inguinal hernias are not part of the study).

Therefore the patients will be divided into two groups, one group will be treated with a resorbing mesh, the other group will be treated with a permanent mesh. Otherwise there will be no difference in the medication or the surgical techniques used.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
95
Inclusion Criteria
  • Primary and secondary ventral hernia

    • less than 20 cm in length
    • less than 6 cm in width
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Non-resorbable meshNon-resorbable synthetic mesh.Non-resorbable synthetic mesh implanted to treat primary and secondary ventral hernia.
Resorbable meshPlacing the resorbable meshLong-term resorbable mesh implanted to treat primary and secondary ventral hernia.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Recurrence rate at 3 years post-surgery.3 years post-surgery

Clinical evaluation and ultrasound evaluation after 3 years post-surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain and discomfort after 1 year post-surgery.After 1 year post-surgery
Wound Morbidity 4 weeks post-surgery.4 weeks post-surgery
Recurrence rate by clinical examination 1 year post-surgery.After 1 year post-surgery.

Clinical Examination to determine the recurrence rate.

Pain and discomfort after 3 years post-surgery.After 3 years post-surgery

Trial Locations

Locations (6)

University Hospital Leuven

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ

Leuven, Belgium

ul Jagalskiego

πŸ‡΅πŸ‡±

Wejherowo, Poland

Ghent University Hospital

πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ

Ghent, Belgium

Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Hospital de 12 Octobre

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Έ

Madrid, Spain

University of Copenhagen

πŸ‡©πŸ‡°

Copenhagen, Denmark

Β© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath