The Development and Effectiveness of Museum-Based Experiences for Individuals With Chronic Pain
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Art RxBehavioral: Usual care/wait listBehavioral: Artful Meditation
- Registration Number
- NCT04091893
- Lead Sponsor
- University of California, Davis
- Brief Summary
Aim 1: To conduct a formative evaluation of museum-based programming to address loneliness and social isolation.
Aim 2: To develop a consensus-derived Model Museum-Based Program (MMBP) to address loneliness among individuals with chronic pain.
Aim 3: To evaluate the feasibility of museum experiences to reduce loneliness and pain among isolated individuals with chronic pain.
Due to safety concerns related to the covid pandemic in-person museum programming could not continue and virtual versions of the interventions were created. We will publish results on both the in-person and virtual versions of the intervention as well as a pooled analysis.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 149
- 18 years of age or older
- English speaking
- Chronic pain (6 months or longer)
- Moderate pain or greater (4/10 or greater on a Numerical Rating Scale, range of 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain imaginable), in response to the question "Over the past week what was your average pain intensity?")
- Moderately lonely or greater (Score of 4 or greater on 3 item Loneliness scale, range of 3 - 9)
- Participated in an Art Rx tour
- Participated in an Artful Meditation program
- Dementia or Alzheimer's disease
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Art Rx + Artful Meditation Art Rx - Art Rx + Artful Meditation Artful Meditation - Usual care/wait list Usual care/wait list - Art Rx Art Rx - Artful Meditation Artful Meditation -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Program satisfaction - quality: NRS Post-intervention (immediately) "Please rate your satisfaction with the overall quality of your experience at the museum?"
NRS - 0 (extremely dissatisfied) - 10 (extremely satisfied)Primary clinical outcome for preliminary estimate of efficacy - Social disconnection Post-intervention (immediately) Social disconnection scale; 12 items; scored 1 (not at all) - 5 (very much); range 12-60
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Social disconnection Post-intervention (immediately) Social disconnection scale; 12 items; scored 1 (not at all) - 5 (very much); range 12-60
Pain unpleasantness Post-intervention (3-month follow up) Numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 0 "not unpleasant" - 10 "Most unpleasant sensation imaginable ("intolerable")"
PHQ 4 Post-intervention (3-month follow up) 4 item scale to measure psychological distress (2 items depression; 2 items anxiety) Likert scale 0 (not at all), 1 (several days), 2 (more than half the days) and 3 (nearly every day)
Affinity for art Post-intervention (3-month follow up) Participants respond to the following prompt: "I like art" Likert scale: 0 (not at all) - 5 (very much)
Pain intensity: Numerical rating scale (NRS) score Post-intervention (3-month follow up) Numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 0 "no pain" - 10 "worst pain imaginable"
Program satisfaction - recommend: NRS Post-intervention (immediately) How likely would you be to recommend this program to someone with a similar condition? NRS - 0 (extremely likely) - 10 (extremely unlikely)
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Post-intervention (3-month follow up) The PCS is a 13 item scale, with each item rated on a 5-point scale between: 0 (Not at all) and 4 (all the time). The PCS is broken into three subscales including: magnification, rumination, and helplessness. The total range of scores is between 0-52 with higher values reflecting more salient impacts of pain on one's day to day experience.
Change in pain during intervention: 1=Yes/0=No Post-intervention (immediately) Did you experience any pain relief during the museum experience? 1=Yes/0=No
Percent change in pain during intervention Post-intervention (immediately) If "Yes", what percent pain relief did you receive? 0%-100%
Pain interference Post-intervention (3-month follow up) PEG scale - a 3 item scale to assess average pain intensity \[P\], interference with enjoyment of life \[E\], and interference with general activity \[G\].
Item 1: What number best describes your pain on the average in the last week?
Numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 0 "no pain" - 10 "worst pain imaginable"
Item 2: What number best describes how, during the past week, pain has interfered with your enjoyment of life?
Numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 0 "does not interfere" - 10 "completely interferes"
Item 3: What number best describes how, during the past week, pain has interfered with your general activity?
Numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 0 "does not interfere" - 10 "completely interferes"Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire 8 (CPAQ-8) Post-intervention (3-month follow up) 8 items scale designed to measure acceptance of pain. Likert scale 0 (never true) - 6 (always true)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
UC Davis Ambulatory Care Center
🇺🇸Sacramento, California, United States