SIROOP Registry - a Prospective Registry Study to Evaluate the Outcomes of Coronary Artery Disease Patients Treated with SIROlimus or Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon Catheters
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary Artery CalcificationAngina, StableCoronary ArteriosclerosisStable Chronic AnginaAngina PectorisStent ThrombosisCoronary RestenosisCoronary DiseaseAngina, Unstable
- Interventions
- Device: Sirolimus Eluting Balloon
- Registration Number
- NCT04988685
- Lead Sponsor
- Luzerner Kantonsspital
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the SIROOP Registry is to retrospectively and prospectively collect baseline, clinical and procedural characteristics of patients who have undergone PCI and are treated with either currently available sirolimus or paclitaxel coated DCBs (see Table 1), irrespective of clinical presentation as well as to prospectively collect data about their clinical outcomes. Outcomes will be compared in different clinical subgroups. The impact of current DCBs in different clinical settings and coronary artery lesions on cardiovascular outcomes will be assessed.
- Detailed Description
Objectives in detail:
* To evaluate procedural success, efficacy, performance and clinical outcomes among various patient cohorts, who undergo PCI using currently available DCBs:
1. Periprocedural outcomes/complications, which will be analyzed, include: final result (e.g. residual stenosis, TIMI flow), dissections, perforations, prevalence of thrombus (assessed by angiography and intravascular imaging)
2. Short and long-term clinical outcomes of interest comprise among others: new MI, unstable angina (UA), target lesion failure, target vessel revascularization, target lesion failure/ revascularization, repeat hospitalization, new/worsening heart failure, cardiogenic shock, stroke, bleedings, cardiovascular death and all-cause death.
* To describe procedural and clinical performance of various DCB, either alone or in combination with other stent and coronary scaffold devices
* To identify optimal strategies for lesion preparation in cases treated with DCB
* To identify possible predictors for TLR after treatment with DCB
* To describe early and late angiographic and OCT-findings among coronary artery disease (CAD) patients treated with DCB and/or various metallic stent and scaffold devices
* To evaluate the impact of different antithrombotic regimens on patient's clinical outcomes
* To study procedural and clinical outcomes among CAD patients requiring hemodynamic support using mechanical devices.
* To describe economic implications (cost-effectiveness) of various interventional treatments for CAD.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 2000
- Subject >18 years of age
- Patients with significant acute or chronic coronary de-novo lesions or ISR lesions requiring treatment using PCI
- Treatment with at least one DCB (device choice at the operator's discretion) In case of a patient with lesions treated at different procedural time, lesions will be separately collected and documented
- Subjects must be willing to sign a patient informed consent (PIC) or must have signed the General Consent (GK).
- Patient is <18 years of age
- Patient unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
- pregnancy and lactation
- Indication for surgical revascularization
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Treatment Sirolimus Eluting Balloon The project ́s main goal is to collect baseline, clinical and procedural data as well as to assess angiographic and clinical outcomes of CAD patients treated with contemporary DCBs.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rate of target lesion failure (TLF) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rate of all myocardial infarction and TV-MI at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of combination of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (including new MI, TLR or cardiovascular death) at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of MACE at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of stent thrombosis or ISR at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of ischemia driven TLR at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of all-cause death at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of TIA or stroke at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of target lesion failure (TLF) at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of major adverse limb events (MALE) at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of procedural success (final diameter stenosis < 30% without flow-limiting dissections) at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of new MI (NSTEMI / STEMI) at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of acute vessel closure at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of cardiac death at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of rehospitalization for recurrent angina at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of acute renal failure/ contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of new ventricular arrhythmias at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of angina according to Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Score at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of cardiogenic shock at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of new York Heart Association (NYHA) class at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of hospitalization for HF at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of rehospitalization for HF, resuscitated cardiac arrest or implantable cardioverter- defibrillator (ICD) implantation at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of vascular complications (according to VARC criteria) at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of periprocedural complications (e.g. coronary perforations, no-reflow) at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years Rate of bleeding events (access site or non-access site related) according to the BARC classification at 180 days, 1, 2 and 5 years
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Luzerner Heart Centre
🇨🇭Lucerne, Switzerland