A Randomized Controlled Study to Assess the Acceptability and Usability of New Delivery Device for Intradermal Vaccination in Healthy Volunteers
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Intradermal injection in the forearm (0,1cc NaCl 0,9%)
- Conditions
- Pain
- Sponsor
- Pierre Van Damme
- Enrollment
- 102
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Adverse events after an injection with an intradermal delivery device and/or intramuscular injection with syringe and needle
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 10 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability and usability of a newly developed intradermal device in healthy adults
Investigators
Pierre Van Damme
Professor
Universiteit Antwerpen
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •healthy adults
Exclusion Criteria
- •people who have regular experience with needle injections, e.g. diabetic patients
- •pregnant women
Arms & Interventions
Intradermal group
These group participants received two intradermal injections with the newly developed device, one in the forearm and one in the upper arm (deltoid region).
Intervention: Intradermal injection in the forearm (0,1cc NaCl 0,9%)
Intradermal group
These group participants received two intradermal injections with the newly developed device, one in the forearm and one in the upper arm (deltoid region).
Intervention: Intradermal injection in the upper arm (0,1cc NaCl 0,9%)
Intramuscular group
These group participants received one intramuscular injection in the upper arm(deltoid region) using needle and syringe and one intradermal injection in the forearm using the newly developed device.
Intervention: Intradermal injection in the forearm (0,1cc NaCl 0,9%)
Intramuscular group
These group participants received one intramuscular injection in the upper arm(deltoid region) using needle and syringe and one intradermal injection in the forearm using the newly developed device.
Intervention: Intramuscular injection in the upper arm (0,5cc NaCl 0,9%)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Adverse events after an injection with an intradermal delivery device and/or intramuscular injection with syringe and needle
Time Frame: during 5 days after the injections
Volunteers were asked to fill a daily electronic diary for 5 days after the injections. The diary surveyed the presence of local reactions (pain at injection site, redness, swelling, ecchymosis and hardening) and systemic adverse events (headache, malaise, chills, myalgia, arthralgia, weakness/fatigue and temperature). In case of local reactions, participants were asked to measure the size of the reaction (in mm). For this purpose, a transparent ruler was provided to the participants at the study day.
Acceptability (e.g. pain) of an injection with an intradermal vaccine delivery device compared to an intramuscular injection with syringe and needle
Time Frame: 1 day (directly after the injections)
Each of the volunteers was asked to complete two questionnaires: first questionnaire surveyed demographic parameters, including gender, age, health care related job or education, number of vaccinations and blood samples taken during the last 5 years, second questionnaire surveyed the experience of ID and/or IM injection, such as anxiety, pain during injection and duration of injection. Also the perception of the participant towards injections into the forearm, which could be perceived as an unnatural site for vaccination, and perception towards the need to undress for IM vaccination, i.e. preparing the upper arm for injection, was asked. The Visual Analogue Scale (1=no agreement; 10=full agreement) was used to score the statements.
Secondary Outcomes
- Usability (e.g. handling) of an injection with an intradermal vaccine delivery device compared to an intramuscular injection with syringe and needle(Within one day after administering the injections)