Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05560932
NCT05560932
Completed
N/A

HIV and Alcohol Research Center Focused on Polypharmacy (HARP) Pilot 1

Yale University1 site in 1 country50 target enrollmentMarch 6, 2023
ConditionsHIVAlcohol Use

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
HIV
Sponsor
Yale University
Enrollment
50
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Enrollment to Assess Feasibility
Status
Completed
Last Updated
10 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This pilot intervention will consist of a brief intervention for patients with HIV who take 5 or more medications and currently (within the past month) consume alcohol. The focus of this pilot will be on bothersome symptoms and the impact of alcohol use and medications on these symptoms. The rationale is that any alcohol use may interact with medications in serious ways leading to adverse outcomes, including bothersome symptoms.

Detailed Description

Additional outcomes were added at results entry.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 6, 2023
End Date
January 4, 2024
Last Updated
10 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • participants in both Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) and Medications, Alcohol, and Substance use in HIV (MASH) studies
  • prescribed 5 or more medications AND who either have a positive PEth value (8+) or a self-reported AUDIT-C value consistent with current alcohol use (score \>0)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Alcohol use disorder (AUD) diagnosis in the past 12 months or who test positive for AUD on the Alcohol Symptom Checklist for moderate or severe AUD (score of 4 or more)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Enrollment to Assess Feasibility

Time Frame: baseline

Number of participants that enrolled and provided informed consent

Completion to Assess Feasibility

Time Frame: Study completion (Post-intervention Day 30)

Number of participants that completed the full pilot intervention

Qualitative Interviews to Assess Feasibility

Time Frame: Study completion (within one to four weeks after Post-intervention Day 30)

Number of participants that successfully completed the qualitative interviews

Change in Bothersome Symptoms From Baseline Using the HIV Symptoms Index

Time Frame: baseline, post-intervention Day 1, Post-intervention Day 30

The HIV Symptoms Index is a 20-item, self-reported measure that assesses presence and perceived distress linked to symptoms associated with HIV or HIV treatment. There are 5 possible responses: 0 = I don't have this symptom; 1 = It doesn't bother me; 2 = It bothers me a little; 3 = It bothers me; and 4 = It bothers me a lot, for each HIV symptom. Presented here is the number of bothersome symptoms with improvement on post-intervention Day 1 and post-intervention Day 30.

Number of Participants That Completed Both PEth Tests to Assess Acceptability.

Time Frame: baseline and Post-intervention Day 30

Change in alcohol levels assessed measuring PEth levels in the blood. PEth testing uses blood to measure alcohol use by detecting direct alcohol biomarkers in the bloodstream. A positive test indicates alcohol use.

Participants Readiness to Change Alcohol Use

Time Frame: baseline, immediately post intervention (day 1) and Post-intervention Day 30

The mean score of participants responses by self report. Participants were asked "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how ready are you to decrease your alcohol use?", "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how important is it for you to decrease your alcohol use?", and "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how confident are you that you can decrease your alcohol use?" Each question is scored on a 1-10 scale (1=not at all ready, 10=extremely ready). Total score range for each question is 1-10 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

Medication Use to Assess Acceptability

Time Frame: Post-intervention Day 30

The number of respondents who reported they (1) felt comfortable with the way medication information was presented, (2) understood the information given, (3) found the information helpful, (4) felt the amount of information was adequate, and (5) felt the information that they received was clear. Participants provided their responses to each question using a 5-point Likert scale (response options 1-5 with higher numbers indicating better acceptability). We will evaluate the number of participants who responded with a 4 or a 5.

Participants Readiness to Change Prescribed Medications

Time Frame: baseline, immediately post intervention (day 1) and Post-intervention Day 30

The mean score of participants responses by self report. Participants were asked "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how ready are you to decrease your medications?", "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how important is it for you to decrease your medications?", and "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how confident are you that you can decrease your medications?" Each question is scored on a 1-10 scale (1=not at all ready, 10=extremely ready). Total score range for each question is 1-10 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

Information Regarding PEth to Assess Acceptability

Time Frame: Post-intervention Day 30

The number of respondents who reported that they (1) felt comfortable with the way PEth information was presented, (2) understood the information given, (3) found the information helpful, (4) felt the amount of information was adequate, and (5) felt the information that they received was clear. Participants provided their responses to each question using a 5-point Likert scale (response options 1-5 with higher numbers indicating better acceptability). We will evaluate the number of participants who responded with a 4 or a 5.

General Feedback to Assess Acceptability

Time Frame: Post-intervention Day 30

The number of respondents who (1) felt they learned new things about their health risk from alcohol, (2) learned new things about their health risk from polypharmacy, (3) learned how medications and alcohol can act together, and (4) felt that having a pharmacist to talk with was helpful. Participants provided their responses to each question using a 5-point Likert scale (response options 1-5 with higher numbers indicating better acceptability). We will evaluate the number of participants who responded with a 4 or a 5.

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials