跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04410289
NCT04410289已完成不适用

A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study to Define and Validate the Standard 'Sniffing Position' in Infants and Toddlers.

Tufts Medical Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2019年7月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
40
试验地点
1
主要终点
Difference in Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) Score

研究概览

简要总结

The "sniffing position" is widely accepted as a favorable position for direct laryngoscopy (DL) in both pediatric and adult patients. External anatomical markers are well documented to confirm proper 'sniffing position' in adults, but data on their use in the pediatric population is sparse. The investigators propose to define these markers in young children and investigate whether patients positioned using this standardized approach have better intubating conditions than those positioned randomly per the preference of the anesthesiologist.

详细描述

The procedure of endotracheal intubation in adults and children is a continuum, and begins with proper head positioning prior to direct laryngoscopy (DL). It is an accepted paradigm that proper positioning optimizes intubating conditions, and decreases subsequent airway maneuvers and manipulation.

The sniffing position is an accepted airway positioning concept in pediatric airway management, and continues to be recommended by experts and textbooks in the field. Anatomical peculiarities such as the large head relative to the torso in infants and toddlers is assumed to put the head in proper position when gently extended. However, reproducible parameters to confirm optimal head positioning remain vague and unclear. In the absence of objective and measurable markers, practitioners position infants and toddlers according to their individual preferences, and as such the procedure lacks definition and objective clarity.

The investigators plan to recruit 40 healthy patients between the ages of 1 month - 48 months and randomize them to be positioned either according to a predetermined algorithm or positioned freely according to the provider's preference. Patients randomized to the intervention group will be positioned with the aim to horizontally align the external auditory meatus (EAM) with the sternal notch (SN).

In summary, the study aims to define the sniffing position for infants and toddlers using reproducible objective secondary markers, and investigate whether a systematic approach to positioning using such markers improves direct laryngoscopic outcomes in the young pediatric patient population.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
1 Month 至 48 Months(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •healthy infants and toddlers undergoing non-emergent surgery under general anesthesia with an oral endotracheal tube

排除标准

  • •neonates (infants under 1 month of age), infants and toddlers with congenital syndromes affecting the airway, and patients undergoing emergency surgery.

研究组 & 干预措施

Intervention Group

Experimental

After induction of general anesthesia, and prior to direct laryngoscopy, patients in the intervention group were positioned using props horizontally aligning the external auditory meatus (EAM) with the sternal notch (SN) and the chin with the sinciput. A lateral side-profile photograph was taken for latter analysis and an Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score card completed.

干预措施: Airway positioning per specified protocol followed by Direct Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation (Procedure)

Control Group

Active Comparator

After induction of general anesthesia, and prior to direct laryngoscopy, patients in the control group were positioned freely according to the provider's preference. A lateral side-profile photograph was taken for latter analysis and an Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score card completed.

干预措施: Airway positioning per provider preference followed by Direct Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Difference in Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) Score

时间窗: The brief time involved (5-10 minutes) involving the process of head positioning, direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.

To assess the difference in IDS scores between the study and control groups

次要结局

  • Angles of Deviation of the EAM-SN plane and Chin-Sinciput Plane from the Horizontal(Post-hoc analysis using a computer program to calculate angles. 10 minutes per patient.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验