Two Different Graft Harvesting Techniques Applied in Localized Gingival Recessions
- Conditions
- Attachment Loss, PeriodontalGingival Recession, LocalizedSensitivity, Tooth
- Interventions
- Procedure: Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft
- Registration Number
- NCT05923294
- Lead Sponsor
- Kutahya Health Sciences University
- Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to compare the root coverage rate of the gingival unit-shaped connective tissue graft, obtained by intraoral de-epithelization, with the traditional de-epithelialized free gingival graft in localized recessions of anterior and premolar teeth. In addition, it is aimed to compare the postoperative gingival thickness between the two techniques. The secondary aim is to search the effects of both techniques on periodontal parameters and to evaluate patient-centered outcomes.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 15
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class 1 and 2 patients,healthy patients
- Nonsmokers
- Periodontally healthy patients
- Localized gingival recessions (Miller I, II, and Cairo I recessions with a depth of recession of at least 2 mm) in anterior and premolar teeth
- Medically compromised patients, especially uncontrolled diabetes
- Pregnancy, lactation, or suspicion of pregnancy,
- Poor oral hygiene
- Recessions associated with caries or restoration
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description De-epithelialized free gingival graft Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft In this split-mouth randomized controlled trial, the coin toss method will determine test and control groups. In both groups, connective tissue graft with a trapezoidal flap design will be applied to the recession area. To obtain the connective tissue graft, the traditional free gingival graft will be de-epithelialized in the control group. De-epithelialized gingival unit graft Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft In this split-mouth randomized controlled trial, the coin toss method will determine test and control groups. In both groups, connective tissue graft with a trapezoidal flap design will be applied to the recession area. To obtain the connective tissue graft, the gingival unit graft will be de-epithelialized in the test group.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Root coverage percentage Postoperative 6th month The comparison of the postoperative recession depth to the initial recession depth
Gingival thickness Preoperative and postoperative 6th month Gingival thickness in the mid-buccal of the recession defect measured with an endodontic spreader and digital recordings
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Vestibular depth Preoperative and postoperative 6th month The distance from the gingival margin to the greatest concavity of the mucosal fold
Recession width Preoperative and postoperative 6th month Recession width measured at the cemento-enamel junction
Keratinized gingiva width Preoperative and postoperative 6th month Mid-buccal gingival width measured with a periodontal probe
Probing depth Preoperative and postoperative 6th month Probing depth measured at the mid-buccal of the recession defect
Pain perception Postoperative 1st week Visual analog scale where higher scores mean a worse outcome and has a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 10
Clinical attachment loss Preoperative and postoperative 6th month Clinical attachment loss measured at the mid-buccal of the recession defect
Bleeding related to the procedure Postoperative 1st week Bleeding evaluated by a dichotomous index
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Kutahya Health Sciences University
🇹🇷Kutahya, Turkey