MedPath

Two Different Graft Harvesting Techniques Applied in Localized Gingival Recessions

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Attachment Loss, Periodontal
Gingival Recession, Localized
Sensitivity, Tooth
Interventions
Procedure: Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft
Registration Number
NCT05923294
Lead Sponsor
Kutahya Health Sciences University
Brief Summary

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the root coverage rate of the gingival unit-shaped connective tissue graft, obtained by intraoral de-epithelization, with the traditional de-epithelialized free gingival graft in localized recessions of anterior and premolar teeth. In addition, it is aimed to compare the postoperative gingival thickness between the two techniques. The secondary aim is to search the effects of both techniques on periodontal parameters and to evaluate patient-centered outcomes.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
15
Inclusion Criteria
  1. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class 1 and 2 patients,healthy patients
  2. Nonsmokers
  3. Periodontally healthy patients
  4. Localized gingival recessions (Miller I, II, and Cairo I recessions with a depth of recession of at least 2 mm) in anterior and premolar teeth
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Medically compromised patients, especially uncontrolled diabetes
  2. Pregnancy, lactation, or suspicion of pregnancy,
  3. Poor oral hygiene
  4. Recessions associated with caries or restoration

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
De-epithelialized free gingival graftCoronally advanced flap with connective tissue graftIn this split-mouth randomized controlled trial, the coin toss method will determine test and control groups. In both groups, connective tissue graft with a trapezoidal flap design will be applied to the recession area. To obtain the connective tissue graft, the traditional free gingival graft will be de-epithelialized in the control group.
De-epithelialized gingival unit graftCoronally advanced flap with connective tissue graftIn this split-mouth randomized controlled trial, the coin toss method will determine test and control groups. In both groups, connective tissue graft with a trapezoidal flap design will be applied to the recession area. To obtain the connective tissue graft, the gingival unit graft will be de-epithelialized in the test group.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Root coverage percentagePostoperative 6th month

The comparison of the postoperative recession depth to the initial recession depth

Gingival thicknessPreoperative and postoperative 6th month

Gingival thickness in the mid-buccal of the recession defect measured with an endodontic spreader and digital recordings

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Vestibular depthPreoperative and postoperative 6th month

The distance from the gingival margin to the greatest concavity of the mucosal fold

Recession widthPreoperative and postoperative 6th month

Recession width measured at the cemento-enamel junction

Keratinized gingiva widthPreoperative and postoperative 6th month

Mid-buccal gingival width measured with a periodontal probe

Probing depthPreoperative and postoperative 6th month

Probing depth measured at the mid-buccal of the recession defect

Pain perceptionPostoperative 1st week

Visual analog scale where higher scores mean a worse outcome and has a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 10

Clinical attachment lossPreoperative and postoperative 6th month

Clinical attachment loss measured at the mid-buccal of the recession defect

Bleeding related to the procedurePostoperative 1st week

Bleeding evaluated by a dichotomous index

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Kutahya Health Sciences University

🇹🇷

Kutahya, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath