Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06314542
NCT06314542RecruitingNot Applicable

Quantitative Evaluation of the Impact of Relaxing Eligibility Criteria on the Risk-benefit Profile of Drugs for Lung Cancer Based on Real-world Data

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences1 site in 1 country50,000 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2013Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
50,000
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Scale of eligibility criteria

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Eligibility criteria for cancer drug trials are generally too stringent, leading to key issues such as low enrolment rates and lack of population diversity. In order to evaluate the REC of NSCLC drug trials, this study will use deep learning methods to construct a structured real-world database of NSCLC across dimensions, and quantitatively assess the independent contribution of changes in each eligibility criterion to patient numbers, clinical efficacy and safety.

Detailed Description

Restrictive eligibility criteria in cancer drug trials result in low enrollment rates and limited population diversity. Relaxed eligibility criteria (REC) based on solid evidence is becoming necessary for stakeholders worldwide. However, the absence of high-quality, favorable evidence remains a major challenge. This study presents a protocol to quantitatively evaluate the impact of relaxing eligibility criteria in common non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) protocols in China, on the risk-benefit profile. This involves a detailed explanation of the rationale, framework, and design of REC.

To evaluate our REC in NSCLC drug trials, we will first construct a structured, cross-dimensional real-world NSCLC database using deep learning methods. We will then establish randomized virtual cohorts and perform benefit-risk assessment using Monte Carlo simulation and propensity matching. Shapley value will be utilized to quantitatively measure the effect of the change of each eligibility criterion on patient volume, clinical efficacy and safety.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Retrospective

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients in the database were considered to be part of the real-world cohort if they were (1) diagnosed with NSCLC according to the tenth revision of the international classification of diseases (ICD-10) code; (2) diagnosed with stage IIIB, IIIC, IV NSCLC between 1 January 2013 and 31 December, 2022; (3) had at least two documented clinical visits on or after 1 January 2013.

Exclusion Criteria

  • (1)NSCLC in stage I-IIIa

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Scale of eligibility criteria

Time Frame: 2024.12.31

Lung cancer clinical trial protocol eligibility criteria

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials