Effect of implant insertion method on bone resorptio

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Edentulous ridge and rehabilitation of masticatory function with dental implants.; Other endosseous dental implant failure; M27.69

• Registration Number: IRCT20180330039161N3
• Lead Sponsor: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 7 October 2019

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 100

Inclusion Criteria

ASA I and II
No debilitating systemic problems
At least 18 years old
Candidate for mandibular molar and premolar area
Angel class I dental occlusion

Exclusion Criteria

Implant inserted for an overdenture
Class 2 and 3 angle classification of malocclusions
Bone qualities of D1 and D4
Fixture exposure due to insufficient bone width during the surgical process and need for guided bone regeneration (GBR)
Infection of implant site
Presence of partial or absolute contra-indication for implant treatment
Uncontrolled metabolic diseases
Osteoporosis
Recent episodes of radio- and chemotherapy and bone disease
Osteomalacia
Paget's disease
Periodontal complications and poor oral hygiene before the surgery (grade 2 or 3, Loe and Silness gingival index and plaque index>15% according to O’Leary index)
Heavy tobacco users
Patients who needed guided bone regeneration around their dental implants

Study & Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Marginal bone resorption around dental implants. Timepoint: Bone level in relation to dental implant at time of surgery, three months and six months after surgery. Method of measurement: standardized radiographical measurements.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Each intervention influencing the amount of resorption. Timepoint: After 3 and 6 month. Method of measurement: Radiographic measurement.