Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01116024
NCT01116024
Completed
Not Applicable

ATS 3f Enable(tm) Aortic Bioprosthesis, Model 6000

Medtronic Cardiovascular10 sites in 5 countries173 target enrollmentMay 2006

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Heart Valve Diseases
Sponsor
Medtronic Cardiovascular
Enrollment
173
Locations
10
Primary Endpoint
Thromboembolism/Thrombosis
Status
Completed
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center study designed to evaluate safety and effectiveness of the ATS 3f Enable Aortic Bioprosthesis in a patient population undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant procedures. The Enable Aortic Valve is an equine pericardial stented bioprosthesis.

Detailed Description

The ATS 3f Enable Aortic Bioprosthesis is intended for those patients whose prognosis without surgical replacement of the diseased natural valve is unacceptably poor in terms of survival and/or quality of life in the opinion of the attending physicians. For these patients, there are a number of widely accepted prosthetic heart valves in use.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 2006
End Date
August 2012
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Medtronic Cardiovascular
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The patient requires isolated aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant procedures such as coronary artery bypass or another valve repair. (The three remaining valves must be of native tissue).
  • The patient is geographically stable and willing to return to the implant site for follow-up visits.
  • The patient has been adequately informed of risks and requirements and consent to his/her participation in the clinical study.
  • If this patient is female and of childbearing potential, patient has a negative pregnancy test within seven (7) days prior to the study procedure.

Exclusion Criteria

  • The patient requires replacement of two or more valves.
  • The patient is \< 20 years of age.
  • The patient has a non-cardiac major or progressive disease, which in the Investigator's experience produces an unacceptable increased risk to the patient, or results in a life expectancy of less than 24 months.
  • The patient is an intravenous drug and/or alcohol abuser.
  • The patient presents with active endocarditis or other systemic infection.
  • The patient has had previous valve replacement surgery, including previous implant and then explant of the ATS 3f Enable Aortic Bioprosthesis (Model 6000) or placement of a rigid annuloplasty ring in the mitral position.
  • The patient is participating in concomitant research studies of investigational products.
  • The patient presents with dilatation of the ascending aorta, Marfan Syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, cystic medial degeneration, or other condition causing the ascending aorta to be irregular in geometry or physiology as seen via preoperative imaging.
  • The patient has chronic renal failure.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Thromboembolism/Thrombosis

Time Frame: Five Years

Valve related thromboembolism and valvular thrombosis. Thrombosis was defined as any thrombus attached to or near the study valve that interfered with valve function in the absence of infection. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year)

Paravalvular Leaks (All and Major)

Time Frame: Five Years

Paravalvular leak was defined as any evidence of leakage of blood around the prosthesis (between the sewing ring and native annulus). Major Paravalvular leak was defined as any evidence of leakage of blood around the prosthesis, i.e. between the sewing ring and native annulus that requires surgical intervention. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).

Endocarditis

Time Frame: Five Years

Endocarditis was defined in the protocol as any infection involving the study valve. Any structural/non-structural valvular dysfunction, thrombosis, or embolic event associated with study valve endocarditis was captured as endocarditis only. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).

Hemolysis

Time Frame: Five Years

Blood data analysis was performed in order to identify whether particular complications and serious adverse events such as hemolysis occurred. Hemolysis in subjects with tissue valves - as evidenced by increased serum lactate dehydrogenase concentrations, decreased serum haptoglobin concentration, erythrocytopenia and reticulocytosis - is usually associated with paravalvular leakage or infection.

Non-Structural Dysfunction

Time Frame: Five Years

Any abnormality resulting in stenosis or regurgitation at the operated valve that is not intrinsic to the valve itself. Non-structural dysfunction refers to non-structural problems that result in dysfunction of an operated valve exclusive of thrombosis and infection diagnosed by reoperation, autopsy, or clinical investigation. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).

Effectiveness Endpoint - NYHA Classification, Hemodynamic Performance

Time Frame: Five Years

New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification to asses improvement of the cardiac status, Hemodynamic Performance analysis based on Doppler echocardiographic studies. Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without limitations of ordinary activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitations or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken discomfort is increased.

Hemorrhage/Bleeding-Anticoagulant/Antiaggregant (All and Major)

Time Frame: Five Years

Any episode of internal or external bleeding in subjects receiving anticoagulant and/or antiaggregant therapy. Hemorrhage/Bleeding (No Anticoagulant/Antiaggregant): Any episode of internal or external bleeding in subjects not receiving anticoagulant and/or antiaggregant therapy. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).

Hemodynamics - Effective Orifice Area

Time Frame: Five Years

Effective orifice area (EOA) data. The effective orifice area is a measure of how much the heart valve prosthesis impedes blood flow through the aortic valve.

Structural Valve Deterioration

Time Frame: Five Years

Structural deterioration was defined as any change in the study valve function which resulted from an intrinsic abnormality that caused stenosis or regurgitation. There were no cases of structural deterioration reported for the study. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).

Re-operation, Explant, Repair

Time Frame: Five Years

Reoperation was defined in the protocol as any operation to repair, alter, or replace the study valve. Included is reoperation for repair of paravalvular leak and explant. The results are reported as linearized rate (percentage of participants per patient-year).

Hemodynamic

Time Frame: Five Years

Mean and peak pressure gradients from discharge through 5 years follow up. The gradient represents the difference in blood pressure across the valve.

Hemodynamics - Effective Orifice Area Index

Time Frame: Five Years

The effective orifice area index is a measure of how much the heart valve prosthesis impedes blood flow through the aortic valve.

Study Sites (10)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials