跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07449429
NCT07449429尚未招募不适用

Development and Multicenter Validation of a Privacy-Preserving OCR-LLM Pipeline for Four-Subtype Coronary Syndrome Classification Using Admission HPI Across Heterogeneous EHR Systems

China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases0 个研究点目标入组 10 人开始时间: 2026年2月28日最近更新:
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
10
主要终点
Overall classification accuracy

研究概览

简要总结

This study develops and validates a privacy-preserving OCR-LLM pipeline that converts admission history of present illness (HPI) records into structured coronary syndrome subtypes (STEMI, NSTEMI, unstable angina, and chronic coronary syndrome). The system first extracts text from de-identified HPI images using locally deployed OCR, then applies large language models with a fixed diagnostic prompt to generate subtype classification and evidence. Performance is evaluated in an internal validation cohort and multiple external datasets covering heterogeneous EHR templates, emergency department cases, and an English dataset from MIMIC-IV. A clinician usability study assesses changes in diagnostic accuracy and time with and without tool assistance.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Hospital encounters with admission HPI documenting sym
  • 2a4afaef-9dc1-47fc-874f-9dffaf7…
  • evant to coronary syndrome subtyping.
  • Cases with sufficient documentation to assign one of four target subtypes (STEMI, NSTEMI, UA, CCS) by adjudication.

排除标准

  • Unclear subtype or incomplete/uncertain time information preventing gold standard assignment.
  • Non-CHD primary reason for admission after screening (for MIMIC-IV cohort).

研究组 & 干预措施

Internal Development and Validation Cohort

Retrospective cohort used for model development and internal validation. Inputs are de-identified admission HPI records (image or text) from the AIM-CHD dataset. Expert adjudication provides the reference standard labels for 4-class coronary syndrome subtyping (STEMI, NSTEMI, unstable angina, chronic coronary syndrome).

干预措施: OCR-Prompt-LLM Information Extraction and Classification Workflow (OCR-Prompt-LLM) (Device)

Internal Development and Validation Cohort

Retrospective cohort used for model development and internal validation. Inputs are de-identified admission HPI records (image or text) from the AIM-CHD dataset. Expert adjudication provides the reference standard labels for 4-class coronary syndrome subtyping (STEMI, NSTEMI, unstable angina, chronic coronary syndrome).

干预措施: Manual Clinical Data Review (Device)

Multicenter External Validation Cohort

Retrospective multicenter cohort used for external validation across heterogeneous EHR templates and documentation styles. De-identified admission HPI records are processed through the same OCR-LLM pipeline, and predictions are compared with expert adjudicated reference labels to assess generalizability.

干预措施: OCR-Prompt-LLM Information Extraction and Classification Workflow (OCR-Prompt-LLM) (Device)

Multicenter External Validation Cohort

Retrospective multicenter cohort used for external validation across heterogeneous EHR templates and documentation styles. De-identified admission HPI records are processed through the same OCR-LLM pipeline, and predictions are compared with expert adjudicated reference labels to assess generalizability.

干预措施: Manual Clinical Data Review (Device)

Emergency Department External Validation Cohort

Retrospective cohort representing real-world emergency department workflow. De-identified ED admission HPI records are used to evaluate model performance under time-sensitive, information-limited conditions and assess robustness to ED documentation variability.

干预措施: OCR-Prompt-LLM Information Extraction and Classification Workflow (OCR-Prompt-LLM) (Device)

Emergency Department External Validation Cohort

Retrospective cohort representing real-world emergency department workflow. De-identified ED admission HPI records are used to evaluate model performance under time-sensitive, information-limited conditions and assess robustness to ED documentation variability.

干预措施: Manual Clinical Data Review (Device)

English EHR External Validation Cohort

Retrospective cohort derived from the public de-identified MIMIC-IV database. English admission notes/HPI text are used to evaluate cross-language transportability and performance of the same classification prompts and post-processing rules against reference labels derived by adjudication/structured diagnosis mapping (as prespecified in the protocol).

干预措施: OCR-Prompt-LLM Information Extraction and Classification Workflow (OCR-Prompt-LLM) (Device)

English EHR External Validation Cohort

Retrospective cohort derived from the public de-identified MIMIC-IV database. English admission notes/HPI text are used to evaluate cross-language transportability and performance of the same classification prompts and post-processing rules against reference labels derived by adjudication/structured diagnosis mapping (as prespecified in the protocol).

干预措施: Manual Clinical Data Review (Device)

Clinician Usability Cohort

Prospective usability evaluation cohort. Physicians complete a structured coronary syndrome subtyping task using admission HPI cases. Outcomes include diagnostic accuracy and time to completion; within-participant comparisons may be performed between unassisted and tool-assisted conditions as prespecified.

干预措施: OCR-Prompt-LLM Information Extraction and Classification Workflow (OCR-Prompt-LLM) (Device)

Clinician Usability Cohort

Prospective usability evaluation cohort. Physicians complete a structured coronary syndrome subtyping task using admission HPI cases. Outcomes include diagnostic accuracy and time to completion; within-participant comparisons may be performed between unassisted and tool-assisted conditions as prespecified.

干预措施: Manual Clinical Data Review (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Overall classification accuracy

时间窗: 1 month

Time Frame: Up to completion of dataset evaluation (internal + external cohorts) Description: Proportion of cases with correct subtype (STEMI/NSTEMI/UA/CCS) compared with expert-adjudicated gold standard.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验