Multicenter, Open-label Study of the Safety (Open-label) and Efficacy (Open-label and Blinded Reader) of a Single Administration of Approximately 0.1 mmol/kg of Magnevist® Injection-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Arteriography (MRA) and 2-dimensional-time-of-flight (2D-TOF) MRA in Patients With Known or Suspected Disease of the Aortic Arch and Cerebral Branches Who Are Undergoing MRA of These Vessels With Intra-arterial Digital Subtraction Arteriography (i.a. DSA) as the Standard of Reference.
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Intervention
- Gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist)
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Abnormalities
- Sponsor
- Bayer
- Enrollment
- 123
- Primary Endpoint
- Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity based on quantitative assessment of stenosis assesses by blinded reader
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 11 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to look at the safety (what are the side effects) and efficacy (how well does it work) of Magnevist (the study drug) used for MRI of the aortic arch and cerebral branches. The results will be compared to the results of MRI taken without Magnevist, and with the results of your X-ray angiography.
Detailed Description
This study has previously been posted by Berlex, Inc. Berlex, Inc. has been renamed to Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.is the sponsor of the trial.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Has known or suspected disease of the aortic arch and cerebral branches
- •Is scheduled for X-ray angiography
Exclusion Criteria
- •Has any contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging
- •Is scheduled for any procedure before the X-ray angiography
- •Had previous bilateral intervention (surgery, bypass) of the arteries of interest
Arms & Interventions
Arm 1
Intervention: Gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity based on quantitative assessment of stenosis assesses by blinded reader
Time Frame: Image creation after injection -evaluation at blind read
Secondary Outcomes
- Diagnostic confidence(At blinded and/or open label read of the images)
- Visual assessment of stenosis(At blinded and/or open label read of the images)
- Difference in degree of stenosis(At blinded and/or open label read of the images)
- Other diagnostic findings(At blinded and/or open label read of the images)
- Location and matching of stenosis(At blinded and/or open label read of the images)
- Image quality(At blinded and/or open label read of the images)
- Image evaluability and presence of artifacts(At blinded and/or open label read of the images)
- Ability to visualize arterial segments(At blinded and/or open label read of the images)
- Number of evaluable segments(At blinded and/or open label read of the images)
- Duration if 2D TOF and CE-MRA(At blinded and/or open label read of the images)
- Patient management(From baseline to 24 hours follow-up)
- Safety variables(From baseline to 24 hours follow-up)
- Proportion of correctly categorized maximum stenosis per segment(At blinded and/or open label read of the images)