Comparison Between Allograft and Enamel Matrix Derivative and Allograft in Treatment of Intrabony Defects

primary goal of periodontal therapy is not arrest the tissue destruction caused periodontal disease only, but also to reconstruct the tissue lost caused by infectious process. Periodontal intrabony defects represent a major challenge for the clinician in periodontal therapy. If left untreated, these defects represent a risk factor for disease progression and additional attachment and bone loss. Surgical intervention is considered the treatment of choice for deep intrabony defects, which have not resolved following completion of cause-related periodontal therapy.

In general, periodontal studies showed that healing of periodontal defect after conventional periodontal therapy by collagenous tissue with epithelial cell migration within the gingival connective tissue and along the root surface. Therefore, a various of methods and techniques used to prevent epithelial ingrowth to the defect site and permit only a selective periodontal cells proliferation in attempt to regenerate periodontal tissues. Regenerative procedures including the use of certain types of bone replacement materials, barrier membranes, enamel matrix derivative (EMD), or various combinations thereof have been shown to facilitate periodontal regeneration characterized histologically by formation of root cementum, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone and result superior in clinical, and radiographical patient reported outcomes compared to access flap surgery alone.

Various bone graft and bone substitutes materials can be helpful in the tissue restoration. This bone graft include autogenous bone graft, allografts, xenografts, and alloplastic materials. Autologous bone is considered the gold standard because of its biological activity due to vital cells and growth factors. Yet, the autologous bone from intra-oral donor sites is of restricted quantities and availability, and the bone tissue obtained from the iliac crest is described to show faster resorption. Moreover, the harvesting of autologous bone often requires a second surgical site associated with an additional bone defect, potential donor site morbidity limiting their application.

In recent years, the use of allogeneic human bone has been favored worldwide, and several histological and morphological studies have demonstrated that, there is no difference in the final stage of incorporation and new bone formation between allografts and autografts. Thus, the application of processed allogenic bone tissue is a reliable and predictable alternative.

Allogeneic bone graft refers to bony tissue that is harvested from one individual and transplanted to a genetically different individual of the same species, principally osteoconductive, although it may have some osteoinductive capability, depending on how it is processed.