Comparison of the Skin Conductance Values and Patient Pain Scores During Minor Procedures in the ICU
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 30
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Sensitivity and specificity with a confidence interval
研究概览
简要总结
Pain in hospitalized patients has received increasing attention, however due to its subjective nature, it has defied objective, quantitative measurements. If a patient is able to communicate, pain may be assessed using standardized sentences, visual analog scales (VAS) or plain numeric scales.
When a patient is unable to communicate, a method that would allow the caregiver to continuously monitor patients' pain and alert the provider that the patient may be in pain would be quite useful. The Pain Monitor uses a novel measurement technique of analyzing changes in skin conductance that can be used in patients who are unable to provide a subjective pain score. This study will compare the relationship between the measurements taken by the PainMonitor and pain scores given by communicative patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this monitor during planned, routine procedures.
详细描述
Although pain must be assessed to be treated, it has been challenging to obtain consistent, objective, and quantifiable measurements. The best methods currently available are subjective scales communicated by the patient such as standardized sentences, visual analog scales (VAS), or plain numeric scales.
When a patient is unable to communicate, methods used to monitor pain are inadequate. A device that provides an objective assessment of pain in these patients would alert the patient's caregivers that the patient may be in pain and analgesic treatment is indicated.
Various methods (Evans et al, 2013; Kantor, 2014; Isnardon, 2013) have been proposed to monitor patients' reactions to nociceptive stimulation such as:
- changes in heart rate or blood pressure
- changes in microcirculation
- pupillometry
- EEG
- Auditory or somatosensory evoked potentials
All of these methods have been found lacking, mostly due to a lack of specificity for pain. Pupillometry is not suitable for long periods of measurement and is sensitive to concomitant treatment (e.g. opioids).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 89 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- •Diagnosed neuropathic disease
- •Use of neostigmine within the past 3 hours
- •Use of regional anesthesia at the extremity where the device electrodes are placed
结局指标
主要结局
Sensitivity and specificity with a confidence interval
时间窗: 1 year
Sensitivity and specificity with a confidence interval \> 80 % when skin conductance responses per sec are \> 0.13 and VAS is equal to or greater than 30 mm. This end point will be reached by 100 patients with at least 10 discrete measurements for each patient.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Elizabeth H. Sinz
Professor
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center