跳至主要内容
临床试验/ChiCTR1800017905
ChiCTR1800017905招募中1 期

COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF MEDIAN NERVE NEURODYNAMIC MOBILIZATION VERSUS CARPAL BONE MOBILIZATION ON PAIN, SYMPTOM SEVERITY AND FUNCTIONAL STATUS IN CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME

Self Financed2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2018年8月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
1 期
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire

研究概览

简要总结

To determine the effectiveness of median nerve mobilization vs. carpal bone mobilization in reducing pain & symptom severity and improving functional status in subjects with carpal tunnel syndrome

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
主要目的
随机平行对照

入排标准

年龄范围
25 至 55(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Age 25-55 years.
  • Both male and female patients diagnosed with CTS;
  • Patients with positive phalen's test, positive tinel's test and positive upper limb tension test for median nerve;
  • Patient's having median nerve latencies above 4ms.

排除标准

  • Any red flags (tumor, fracture, metabolic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis,HTN, prolonged history of steroid use, etc);
  • Patients with double crush syndrome, cervical or thoracic origin of symptoms, scaphoid instability, shoulder injuries, recent fractures and crush injuries, hypermobile joints, pregnancy and women undergoing hormone replacement therapy;
  • Evidence of central nervous system involvement;
  • Patients who requested to leave the study and history of other treatments including local corticosteroid and using of physical modalities and physiotherapy injection and splint in 3 months ago;
  • Any sensory and/or motor deficit in either ulnar or radial nerve.

研究组 & 干预措施

Group 1

Carpal Bone Mobilization

Group 2

Median Nerve Neurodynamic Mobilization

结局指标

主要结局

Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire

时间窗: Pretreatment, after 3 weeks, after 6 weeks

Numeric rating pain scale

时间窗: Pretreatment, after 3 weeks, after 6 weeks

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Self Financed

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验