MedPath

Investigational Device Exemption Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of the Astron and Pulsar Stents

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Peripheral Artery Disease
Peripheral Vascular Disease
Interventions
Device: Pulsar Stents
Device: Astron Stents
Registration Number
NCT01319812
Lead Sponsor
Biotronik, Inc.
Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to separately demonstrate the safety and efficacy of BIOTRONIK's Astron and Pulsar stents. The Pulsar stent will be used for the treatment of femoro-popliteal lesions, located in the native superficial femoral artery (SFA) or proximal popliteal artery (PPA), while the Astron stent will be used for the treatment of the common or external iliac artery lesions.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
463
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Pulsar Stent GroupPulsar StentsParticipants indicated for stenting in superficial femoral or proximal popliteal atherosclerotic lesions. Intervention: Device: Pulsar Stents
Astron Stent GroupAstron StentsParticipants indicated for stenting in iliac atherosclerotic lesions. Intervention: Device: Astron Stents
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Safety and Effectiveness Endpoint for the Astron Stent - Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAE)12 months

The primary endpoint for the Astron stent is a composite of the rate of procedure- or stent-related major adverse events at 12 months post-index procedure. The major adverse event rate includes 30-day mortality, along with 12-month rates of target lesion revascularization and index limb amputation. Success was measured against a performance goal of 15%, given a 7.5% expected 12-month MAE rate, with an assumed delta value of 7.5%.

Effectiveness Endpoint for the Pulsar Stent: Primary Patency12 months

The primary effectiveness endpoint for the Pulsar stent group is the primary patency rate at 12 months post-index procedure. Primary patency is defined as freedom from more than 50% restenosis based on the duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio, comparing data within the treated segment to the proximal normal segment or based on a clinically-indicated TLR with angiographic evidence of \> 50% stenosis.

Safety Endpoint for the Pulsar Stent: Freedom From Procedure- or Stent-related Major Adverse Events30 days

The primary safety endpoint for the Pulsar stent is the freedom from procedure- or stent-related major adverse events at 30 days post-index procedure. The major adverse event rate includes mortality, target lesion revascularization and index limb amputation.

Percentage of Participants With Primary Safety Endpoint (Post Market Analysis)36 Months

Freedom from a composite of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) and index limb amputation at 36 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Secondary Safety Assessment for the Astron Stent - Distribution of MAE Rate12 months

Evaluate the contribution of the individual rates of 30-day mortality and 12-month target lesion revascularization and index limb amputation rates to the primary endpoint for the Astron stent.

Functional Assessments for Subjects With the Astron and Pulsar Stents - Ankle - Brachial Index (ABI) Measurement12 months

The purpose of this endpoint is to compare the ABI measurements between baseline and 12 months post-index procedure. ABI is the ratio of systolic blood pressure of ankle relative to systolic blood pressure of arm.

Functional Assessments for Subjects With the Astron and Pulsar Stents - Walking Impairment Questionnaire Walking Distance Score12 months

The purpose of this endpoint is to compare Walking Impairment Questionnaire Walking Distance score between baseline and 12 months post-index procedure. The WIQ is a subjective questionnaire completed by participants at baseline and the 12 month visit which asks questions about mobility to assess walking impairment. Larger numbers indicate better outcomes, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 100.. Please see the following publication for further information:

Hiatt WR, Hirsch AT, Regensteiner JG, et al. Clinical Trials for Claudication. Assessment of Exercise Performance, Functional Status, and Clinical Endpoints. Vascular Clinical Trialists. Circulation. 1995;92:614-621

Secondary Effectiveness Assessment for the Astron and Pulsar Stents - Primary Assisted Patency12 months

Evaluate the primary assisted patency rate (freedom from remote Target Vessel Revascularization \[TVR\]) for the Astron and Pulsar stent at 12 months post-index procedure.

Functional Assessments for Subjects With the Astron and Pulsar Stents - Six-Minute Walk Test12 months

The purpose of this endpoint is to compare the distance walked during the 6-minute walk test between baseline and 12 months post-index procedure.

Clinical Success30 days

Evaluate the 30-day clinical success of the procedure. The 30-day clinical success is defined as completion of the assigned procedure, the stented lesion having less than 30% residual stenosis determined by angiography immediately after stent placement and no MAEs within 30 days of the index procedure.

Comparison of Endpoints Results Between Occlusive and Non-occlusive Lesions for Astron and Pulsar Stent - 30 Day MAE Rate30 days

Compare the 30 day MAE rate results between evaluable subjects treated for occlusive lesions (100% stenosis) and evaluable subjects treated for non-occlusive lesions (70% - 99% stenosis) for the Astron stent and the Pulsar stent group.

Comparison of Endpoints Results Between Occlusive and Non-occlusive Lesions for Astron and Pulsar Stent - Acute Procedure SuccessAcute / Date of Procedure

Compare the acute procedure success results between evaluable subjects treated for occlusive lesions (100% stenosis) and evaluable subjects treated for non-occlusive lesions (70% - 99% stenosis) for the Astron stent and the Pulsar stent group.

Comparison of Endpoint Results Between Standard and Long Lesions for the Pulsar Stent - Secondary Patency Rate at 12 Months12 months

Compare the secondary patency rate at 12 months between evaluable subjects treated with standard length lesions (between 20 mm and 140 mm) and evaluable subjects treated for long lesions (between 141 mm and 190 mm) for the Pulsar stent group.

Safety Assessment for the Pulsar Stent: Percentage of Participants With Mortality, TLR, and Index Limb Amputation (Post Approval)24 Months

Evaluate the contribution of the individual rates of mortality, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and index limb amputation at 30 days post-index procedure to the primary safety endpoint for the Pulsar stent.

Secondary Safety Assessment for the Pulsar Stent: Individual Rates of Mortality, TLR, and Index Limb Amputation30 days

Evaluate the contribution of the individual rates of mortality, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and index limb amputation at 30 days post-index procedure to the primary safety endpoint for the Pulsar stent.

Stent Integrity Assessment for the Pulsar Stent: Stent Fracture Rate12 months

Evaluate the Pulsar stent integrity as measured by x-ray at 12 months post-index procedure. An independent angiographic core laboratory reviewed x-ray imaging for presence or absence of a stent fracture. Fractures were assessed with Grade I indicating a single tine fracture, Grade II indicating multiple tine fracture, Grade III indicating stent fracture(s) with preserved alignment of the components, Grade IV indicating stent fracture(s) with mal-alignment of the components, and Grade V stent fracture(s) in a trans-axial spiral configuration. Generally, fractures of Grade I are least severe, increasing in severity to Grade V.

Secondary Effectiveness Assessment for the Astron and Pulsar Stents - Secondary Patency12 months

Evaluate the secondary patency rate (freedom from bypass and amputation of the target limb) for the Astron and Pulsar stent at 12 months post-index procedure.

Functional Assessments for Subjects With the Astron and Pulsar Stents - Walking Impairment Questionnaire PAD Specific Score12 months

The purpose of this endpoint is to compare Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) specific score between baseline and 12 months post-index procedure. The WIQ is a subjective questionnaire completed by participants at baseline and the 12 month visit which asks questions about mobility to assess walking impairment. Larger numbers indicate better outcomes, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 100. Please see the following publication for further information:

Hiatt WR, Hirsch AT, Regensteiner JG, et al. Clinical Trials for Claudication. Assessment of Exercise Performance, Functional Status, and Clinical Endpoints. Vascular Clinical Trialists. Circulation. 1995;92:614-621

Comparison of Endpoints Results Between Occlusive and Non-occlusive Lesions for Astron and Pulsar Stent - Primary Patency at 12-months12 months

Compare the primary patency at 12-months results between evaluable subjects treated for occlusive lesions (100% stenosis) and evaluable subjects treated for non-occlusive lesions (70% - 99% stenosis) for the Astron stent and the Pulsar stent group.

Comparison of Endpoints Results Between Occlusive and Non-occlusive Lesions for Astron and Pulsar Stent - Primary Assisted Patency at 12-Months12 months

Compare the primary assisted patency (freedom from remote TVR) at 12-months results between evaluable subjects treated for occlusive lesions (100% stenosis) and evaluable subjects treated for non-occlusive lesions (70% - 99% stenosis) for the Astron stent and the Pulsar stent group.

Comparison of Endpoints Results Between Occlusive and Non-occlusive Lesions for Astron and Pulsar Stent - 30-Day Clinical Success30 days

Compare the 30-day clinical success results between evaluable subjects treated for occlusive lesions (100% stenosis) and evaluable subjects treated for non-occlusive lesions (70% - 99% stenosis) for the Astron stent and the Pulsar stent group.

Comparison of Endpoint Results Between Standard and Long Lesions for the Pulsar Stent - Stent Fracture Rate at 12 Months12 months

Compare the stent fracture rate at 12 months between evaluable subjects treated with standard length lesions (between 20 mm and 140 mm) and evaluable subjects treated for long lesions (between 141 mm and 190 mm) for the Pulsar stent group.

Number of Participants With Stent Fracture at 36 Months (Post Approval) (Pulsar Stent Group).36 Months
Percentage of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events at 36 Months (Post Approval) (Pulsar Stent Group).36 months

Summary of serious adverse event rates at 36 months. Refer to SAE section.

Long-Term Safety Assessment for the Pulsar Stent: Major Adverse Event Rate12 months

Evaluate the long-term major adverse event rate of the Pulsar stent. Likewise, the endpoint will evaluate the contribution of the individual rates of 30-day mortality and 12-month target lesion revascularization and index limb amputation rates to this overall, long-term major adverse event rate.

Comparison of Endpoints Results Between Occlusive and Non-occlusive Lesions for Astron and Pulsar Stent - Secondary Patency Rate at 12-Months12 months

Compare the secondary patency (freedom from bypass and amputation of the target limb) at 12-months results between evaluable subjects treated for occlusive lesions (100% stenosis) and evaluable subjects treated for non-occlusive lesions (70% - 99% stenosis) for the Astron stent and the Pulsar stent group.

Comparison of Endpoint Results Between Standard and Long Lesions for the Pulsar Stent - Primary Patency at 12 Months12 months

Compare the primary patency rate at 12 months between evaluable subjects treated with standard length lesions (between 20 mm and 140 mm) and evaluable subjects treated for long lesions (between 141 mm and 190 mm) for the Pulsar stent group.

Comparison of Endpoint Results Between Standard and Long Lesions for the Pulsar Stent - Acute Procedure SuccessAcute / Date of Procedure

Compare the acute procedure success results between evaluable subjects treated with standard length lesions (between 20 mm and 140 mm) and evaluable subjects treated for long lesions (between 141 mm and 190 mm) for the Pulsar stent group.

Comparison of Endpoint Results Between Standard and Long Lesions for the Pulsar Stent - 30-day Clinical Success30 days

Compare the 30-day clinical success results between evaluable subjects treated with standard length lesions (between 20 mm and 140 mm) and evaluable subjects treated for long lesions (between 141 mm and 190 mm) for the Pulsar stent group.

Percentage of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at 36 Months (Post Approval) (Pulsar Stent Group)36 Months
Secondary Effectiveness Assessment for the Astron Stent - Primary Patency Rate12 months

Evaluate the primary patency of the Astron stent at 12 months post-index procedure as measured by duplex ultrasound. Primary patency is defined as freedom from more than 50% restenosis based on the duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio, comparing data within the treated segment to the proximal normal segment or based on a clinically-indicated TLR with angiographic evidence of \> 50% stenosis.

Comparison of Endpoint Results Between Standard and Long Lesions for the Pulsar Stent - MAE Rate12 months

Compare the MAE rate results between evaluable subjects treated with standard length lesions (between 20 mm and 140 mm) and evaluable subjects treated for long lesions (between 141 mm and 190 mm) for the Pulsar stent group.

Number of Participants With Freedom From Clinically-driven TLR and Index Limb Amputation at 24 Months (Post Approval)24 Months

Evaluate the rate of freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) and/or index limb amputation for the Pulsar stent.

Functional Assessments for Subjects With the Astron and Pulsar Stents - Walking Impairment Questionnaire Walking Speed Score12 months

The purpose of this endpoint is to compare Walking Impairment Questionnaire Walking Speed score between baseline and 12 months post-index procedure. The WIQ is a subjective questionnaire completed by participants at baseline and the 12 month visit which asks questions about mobility to assess walking impairment. Larger numbers indicate better outcomes, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 100.. Please see the following publication for further information:

Hiatt WR, Hirsch AT, Regensteiner JG, et al. Clinical Trials for Claudication. Assessment of Exercise Performance, Functional Status, and Clinical Endpoints. Vascular Clinical Trialists. Circulation. 1995;92:614-621

Functional Assessments for Subjects With the Astron and Pulsar Stents - Walking Impairment Questionnaire Stair Climbing Score12 months

The purpose of this endpoint is to compare Walking Impairment Questionnaire Stair Climbing score between baseline and 12 months post-index procedure. The WIQ is a subjective questionnaire completed by participants at baseline and the 12 month visit which asks questions about mobility to assess walking impairment. Larger numbers indicate better outcomes, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 100. Please see the following publication for further information:

Hiatt WR, Hirsch AT, Regensteiner JG, et al. Clinical Trials for Claudication. Assessment of Exercise Performance, Functional Status, and Clinical Endpoints. Vascular Clinical Trialists. Circulation. 1995;92:614-621

Acute Procedural Success for Astron and Pulsar Stent30 days

Evaluate the acute procedural success of the Astron and Pulsar stent. Acute procedural success is defined as completion of the assigned procedure, the stented lesion having less than 30% residual stenosis determined by angiography immediately after stent placement and no MAEs before hospital discharge.

Secondary Safety Assessment for Astron and Pulsar Stent: Adverse Event Rates12 month

Evaluate the rates of all individual adverse event types that are not included in the primary endpoint analyses for the Astron stent and the Pulsar stent group. Please see the Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events sections for event details.

Comparison of Endpoint Results Between Standard and Long Lesions for the Pulsar Stent - Primary Assisted Patency at 12 Months12 months

Compare the primary assisted patency rate at 12 months between evaluable subjects treated with standard length lesions (between 20 mm and 140 mm) and evaluable subjects treated for long lesions (between 141 mm and 190 mm) for the Pulsar stent group.

Percentage of Participants for the Pulsar Stent Group With MAE (30-day Mortality, Clinically-driven TLR, and Index Limb Amputation) and Their Components at 36 Months (Post Approval).36 Months

Evaluate the MAE rate and the individual component rates of mortality at 30 days post-index procedure, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and index limb amputation for the Pulsar stent.

Percentage of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at 24 Months (Post Approval) (Pulsar Stent Group)24 Months
Number of Participants With Stent Fracture at 24 Months (Post Approval).24 Months
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath