MedPath

Enhancement of Connect to Protect® (C2P)

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
HIV Infection
Interventions
Behavioral: Community Mobilization
Registration Number
NCT01492816
Lead Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Brief Summary

The proposed study seeks to continue Connect to Protect® (C2P) community mobilization efforts that have developed coalitions that plan for and bring about structural changes for purposes of reducing HIV incidence and prevalence among youth in targeted communities at nine sites.

Detailed Description

Earlier phases of C2P have been outlined in ATN Protocols 016a, 016b, 040/040b. The C2P community mobilization model entails: determining a geographic area and population of focus for the coalitions to prioritize their planning and action (accomplished in an earlier phase of C2P); coalitions establishing a shared vision and mission; development of a strategic plan focused on structural changes to reduce risks associated with HIV; process documentation; and feedback as technical assistance to the coalitions. The National Coordinating Center (NCC), operating under the direction of the Protocol Chair, provides guidance, training, technical assistance and feedback to coalitions.

This protocol continues the C2P mobilization effort and includes enhanced strategic planning activities to assist the coalitions in identifying necessary and relevant structural changes. The evaluation of C2P includes both process evaluation (i.e., documentation of coalition actions and achievements of structural changes; and outcome evaluation to qualitatively assess (via Key Informant (KI) interviews) if and how C2P efforts, including completed structural changes, have influenced the risk environment within each community. In addition, local health surveillance data and HIV testing data will be used to evaluate changes in HIV testing patterns and HIV/Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) morbidity among youth.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
927
Inclusion Criteria
  1. The intervention group = Community members who become engaged in the coalitions and in the broader mobilization effort; and
  2. The evaluation group = Key Informants within each C2P community who either work or reside within the sectors or systems where structural changes have been accomplished and/or the coalition has focused their strategic planning efforts.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Intervention GroupCommunity MobilizationCommunity members who become engaged in the coalitions and in the broader mobilization effort. A subset of community members.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To assess the extent to which C2P activities influence elements of the community that affect HIV-related risk prevention, testing, treatment and linkage to healthcare among youth aged 12-24 years and represent intermediate outcomes for this study.End of year 5 (study completion)

Assessment will include evaluation across three primary intermediate outcome areas:

1. Achievement of SCOs (programs, policies, practices) that target increased levels of HIV-related prevention, testing, and linkage to healthcare.

2. Increased community capacity and social capital to address HIV-related prevention, testing, and linkage to healthcare.

3. Increasing levels of sustainability across the HIV continuum of care (CoC) including prevention, testing, and linkage to healthcare activities initiated or influenced by C2P, including programs, policies, and new relationships between people or organizations.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Examine how attributes of the SCOs relate to intermediate outcomes in order to provide guidance and recommendations to policy makers.End of year 5 (study completion)

Attributes that will be analyzed include:

1. Change strategy (e.g., information provision, policy change, relationship formation, program creation).

2. Sector(s) where change occurs.

3. Distal vs. proximal causes targeted.

4. Youth population affected by change (e.g., universal, selected or indicated). In addition, strategies associated with SCO achievement (e.g., creating linkages, honest brokering, strategic partnering, etc.) will be examined for trends and associations.

Assess the trends and associations with strategies used to achieve SCOs (e.g., creating linkages, honest brokering, strategic partnering, etc.)End of year 5 (study completion)

Trial Locations

Locations (9)

Children's Hospital of Los Angeles

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

University of South Florida

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

Children's Hosp Natinal Med Center

🇺🇸

Washington, District of Columbia, United States

University of Miami School of Medicine

🇺🇸

Miami, Florida, United States

Stoger Hospital of Cook County

🇺🇸

Chicago, Illinois, United States

St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital

🇺🇸

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Tulane University Health Sciences Center

🇺🇸

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Montefiore Medical Center

🇺🇸

Bronx, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath