MedPath

Microwave Ablation or Wedge Resection for the Treatment of Lung, Sarcoma and Colorectal Lesions, ALLUME Study

Recruiting
Conditions
Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma
Stage IA3 Lung Cancer AJCC v8
Stage II Lung Cancer AJCC v8
Stage III Lung Cancer AJCC v8
Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8
Metastatic Sarcoma
Stage I Lung Cancer AJCC v8
Stage IA2 Lung Cancer AJCC v8
Stage IIA Lung Cancer AJCC v8
Stage IIIA Lung Cancer AJCC v8
Interventions
Procedure: Computed Tomography with Contrast
Procedure: Microwave Ablation
Other: Questionnaire Administration
Procedure: Wedge Excision
Registration Number
NCT04430725
Lead Sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Brief Summary

This study compares the outcomes and safety of two standard treatment options called microwave ablation and surgical wedge resection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, sarcoma and colorectal cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic). Microwave ablation is designed to kill tumor cells by heating the tumor until the tumor cells die. A wedge resection is a procedure that involves the surgical removal of a small, wedge-shaped piece of lung tissue to remove a small tumor or to diagnose lung cancer. Comparing these two treatment options may help researchers learn which method works better for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic sarcoma, and metastatic colorectal cancer.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. Estimate the 2-year local recurrence rate for microwave ablation within a basket.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Evaluate whether microwave ablation offers treatment benefit for safety when compared to wedge resection using a contemporaneous database consisting of a commensurate surgical patient population.

II. Evaluate whether microwave ablation offers treatment benefit for efficacy when compared to wedge resection using a contemporaneous database consisting of a commensurate surgical patient population.

III. Evaluate whether microwave ablation offers treatment benefit for changes in patient reported outcomes when compared to wedge resection using a contemporaneous database consisting of a commensurate surgical patient population.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo standard care microwave ablation or wedge resection followed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) imaging at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Patients also complete questionnaires over 10-15 minutes at baseline up to 9 months.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient has a lung lesion(s) that is either biopsy-proven cancer or shows sequential growth on CT imaging with clinical suspicion for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-stage I; NSCLC-stage > 1; metastatic sarcoma; or metastatic colorectal (CRC) cancer
  • 3 cm or less tumor size
  • Other sites for cancer are either controlled or there are plans for control
  • Expected margin at least 1 cm from critical structures, allowing for protective strategies such as induction of therapeutic pneumothorax. Critical structures include the trachea, main bronchi, esophagus, aorta, aortic arch branches, superior vena cava (SVC), main, right or left pulmonary artery, or heart.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient is considered high risk for ablation due to major comorbid medical conditions
  • Patient is pregnant or breast feeding
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Observational (microwave ablation, wedge excision, CT)Questionnaire AdministrationPatients undergo standard care microwave ablation or wedge resection followed by contrast-enhanced CT imaging at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Patients also complete questionnaires over 10-15 minutes at baseline up to 9 months.
Observational (microwave ablation, wedge excision, CT)Wedge ExcisionPatients undergo standard care microwave ablation or wedge resection followed by contrast-enhanced CT imaging at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Patients also complete questionnaires over 10-15 minutes at baseline up to 9 months.
Observational (microwave ablation, wedge excision, CT)Computed Tomography with ContrastPatients undergo standard care microwave ablation or wedge resection followed by contrast-enhanced CT imaging at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Patients also complete questionnaires over 10-15 minutes at baseline up to 9 months.
Observational (microwave ablation, wedge excision, CT)Microwave AblationPatients undergo standard care microwave ablation or wedge resection followed by contrast-enhanced CT imaging at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Patients also complete questionnaires over 10-15 minutes at baseline up to 9 months.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to local recurrence per treated noduleUp to 2 years post-ablation

Will be measured from the first date of treatment and characterized according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria and/or biopsy. The local recurrence of each subtype will be adjusted according to the method proposed by Fine and Gray. Will evaluate each basket individually and allow patients to contribute multiple nodules. Therefore, the Bayesian piecewise constant frailty model will be used to account for interdependence in the failure duration of nodules arising from the same patient. Additional posterior summaries will be reported, such as median failure duration. Additionally, will report plots of the full time-to-failure distribution with pointwise 95% Bayesian credible intervals.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Changes in patient reported outcomes per patientUp to 9 months after enrollment

Will be reported as time to symptom recovering using MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Lung Cancer (MDASI-LC) questionnaires. Frequentist interference will use the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time to local recurrence per patientUp to 2 years post-ablation

Contrast-enhanced CT imaging will be used to monitor for local recurrence. Local recurrence will be defined either by a positive biopsy or by radiographic RECIST criteria. Frequentist interference will use the Kaplan-Meier method.

Incidence of clinically significant adverse eventsUp to 30 days

The occurrence of significant adverse events will be recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) published by the National Institutes of Health. Grade III or above adverse events within the following categories: cardiac disorders, general disorders and administration site conditions, infections and infestations, injury, poisoning and procedural complications, and respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders. 30-day mortality will also be recorded. Patient adverse events will be tabulated by symptom grade and categories.

Regional and distance recurrenceUp to 2 years post-ablation

Regional and distant recurrence will be defined either by a positive biopsy or by radiographic RECIST criteria. Frequentist interference will use the Kaplan-Meier method.

Overall survival per patientUp to 2 years post-ablation

Frequentist interference will use the Kaplan-Meier method.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

M D Anderson Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath