Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02764814
NCT02764814
Completed
Not Applicable

In Vivo Confocal Microscopic Analysis of Corneal Nerve Changes After ProKera Slim® for Dry Eye

Tissue Tech Inc.1 site in 1 country20 target enrollmentJuly 2015
ConditionsDry Eye Disease

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Dry Eye Disease
Sponsor
Tissue Tech Inc.
Enrollment
20
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Short-term efficacy in terms of corneal nerve regeneration
Status
Completed
Last Updated
9 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Prospective controlled pilot study to compare the outcome of ProKera® (PK) and conventional treatment in patients with moderate to severe Dry Eye Disease (DED)

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2015
End Date
November 2016
Last Updated
9 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Tissue Tech Inc.
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects with moderate to severe DED (Grade 2-4 DEWS)
  • Age range: 21 years and older.
  • Both genders and all ethnic groups comparable with the local community.
  • Subjects able to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent.
  • Subjects able and willing to cooperate with investigational plan.
  • Subjects able and willing to complete postoperative follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Symblepharon or lid abnormality preventing ProKera placement.
  • Ocular infection within 14 days prior to study entry.
  • Active ocular allergies.
  • Previous ocular surgery or injury within 3 months before enrollment.
  • Previous brain surgery, or Trigeminal nerve damage.
  • Other conditions that may affect corneal nerves such as diabetes, thyroid disorders.
  • Contact lens wearers.
  • Pregnancy or subject expecting to be pregnant.
  • Inability or unwillingness of subject to give written informed consent.
  • Subjects with known intolerance to PK.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Short-term efficacy in terms of corneal nerve regeneration

Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1 month

Assessed by corneal topography

Short-term efficacy in terms of ocular surface integrity

Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1 month

Assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy

Short-term efficacy in terms of corneal sensitivity

Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1 month

Short-term efficacy in terms of ocular clinical symptoms

Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1 month

Assessed by SPEED questionnaire, pain score, and dry eye workshop grading

Secondary Outcomes

  • Long-term efficacy in terms of corneal nerve regeneration(Change from Baseline to 3 month)
  • Long-term efficacy in terms of ocular surface integrity(Change from Baseline to 3 month)
  • Long-term efficacy in terms of corneal sensitivity(Change from Baseline to 3 month)
  • Long-term efficacy in terms of ocular clinical symptoms(Change from Baseline to 3 month)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials