Comparative Effect of Active Release Technique Versus Self-myofascial Release in Improving Piriformis Syndrome. A Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 82
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Range of Motion by Goniometer (change is being assessed)
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this Randomized controlled trial is to examine comparative effect of active release technique versus self-myofascial release in improving piriformis syndrome. The main question it aims to answer is:
• To compare the effects of Active release technique (ART) and Self-Myofascial release (SMFR) on pain intensity, hip internal rotation and functional disability in patients with piriformis syndrome.
Participants will be a given consent form and after subjects read and sign the informed consent, they would be included in study according to eligibility criteria. 2 groups would be included in study, Active release technique will be applied on group A by the physiotherapist and self-myofascial release will be applied on group B by the patients themselves through the use of foam-rollers and massage ball to compare the results of both these techniques on reducing pain, improving range and functional disability among individuals with piriformis syndrome. We will measure outcome through different outcome measure tools.
详细描述
Piriformis is a key internal rotator of the hip which develops muscular imbalance due to overuse and pressure. There are various disabling conditions caused due to a simple tightness of Piriformis muscle like low back pain, sciatic nerve pain through muscle hypertrophy or a nearby anomaly due to its anatomically closeness to the sciatic nerve, pain and aesthesia in hip, thigh, calf and foot are symptoms that commonly occur in Piriformis syndrome. Piriformis syndrome is defined as a peripheral neuritis of the branches of the sciatic nerve caused by an abnormal condition of the piriformis muscle (PM), such as an injured or irritated muscle.
MFR technique involves application of a low load-long duration stretch to the myofascial complex which intends to restore the optimal length, decrease pain and improve functional mobility of the muscle. A special technique within MFR is self-myofascial release (SMFR), performed by the patient independently, instead of by a therapist. This technique utilizes the patient's body mass and special tools such as massage balls or foam rollers to apply pressure and stretch the restricted soft tissue. Active Release Techniques (ART) are a soft tissue method that focuses on relieving tissue tension via the removal of fibrosis/adhesions which can develop in tissues as a result of overload due to repetitive use.
Active release technique will be applied on group A by the physiotherapist and self-myofascial release will be applied on group B by the patients themselves through the use of foam-rollers and massage ball to compare the results of both these techniques on reducing pain, improving range and functional disability among individuals with piriformis syndrome.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 40 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •20-40 years
- •males and females
- •Pain more than 1 month.
- •Piriformis syndrome diagnosed through screening tests (FAIR test, Beatty test, Freiberg test, Sign of Pace)
- •A score ≥8 on a 12-point Clinical scoring system for diagnosis of piriformis syndrome
排除标准
- •Inflammation, malignancy, arthritis, active infection, post-partum or pregnant females and post-op patients, any deformity.
- •Leg pain due to causes other than piriformis syndrome
- •Any traumatic History.
结局指标
主要结局
Range of Motion by Goniometer (change is being assessed)
时间窗: Change from Baseline range of motion at 6 weeks
Range of straight leg raise (SLR) and Internal rotation range would be measured
Lower extremity functional scale (change is being assessed)
时间窗: Change from Baseline at 6 weeks
The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) is a valid patient-rated outcome measure (PROM) for the measurement of lower extremity function. The maximum possible score is 80 points, indicating very high function. The minimum possible score is 0 points, indicating very low function.
Likert pain scale (change is being assessed)
时间窗: Change from Baseline at 6 weeks
Pain intensity is principally assessed using rating scales such as the 11-point Likert scale. In general, frequent pain assessments are serially correlated and underdispersed. The aim of this investigation was to develop population models adapted to fit the 11-point pain scale.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Waseem Javaid
Project Director
Sehat Medical Complex
