CTC Changes and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-negative Breast Cancer
- Conditions
- Breast Neoplasms
- Interventions
- Drug: Taxanes or/and anthracycline-based therapy
- Registration Number
- NCT04059003
- Lead Sponsor
- Shengjing Hospital
- Brief Summary
Chemotherapy before operation for malignant tumors can reduce the size of tumors to a certain extent, even eliminate micrometastases. Chemotherapy can also detect the sensitivity of chemotherapeutic drugs and create opportunities for breast-conserving or surgical treatment for patients. This may lead to high survival opportunities for triple-negative breast cancer patients who are not sensitive to targeted therapy or endocrine therapy. However, during neoadjuvant therapy, CT or MRI tests are needed to monitor the patient's condition. Therefore, if there is any deterioration, to consider changing the treatment regimen or immediately carrying out surgery is necessary. However, because of the need for multiple imaging examinations during neoadjuvant therapy, which will increase medical costs, to explore a cheaper examination method is necessary . Circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood are derived from the shedding of breast cancer lesions. Detection of these circulating tumor cells may monitor the therapeutic effect on breast cancer, and the cost of detecting circulating tumor cells is much lower than that of conventional PET-CT, which can obviously reduce the medical costs of patients. However, there is no clinical study on the changes of circulating tumor cells and the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer in and outside China.
- Detailed Description
Triple-negative breast cancer refers to breast cancer with negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor. Triple-negative breast cancer has poor differentiation, high invasiveness and high recurrence rate, accounting for 15.0%-23.8% of breast cancer. Due to the phenotypic specificity of triple-negative breast cancer, both targeted therapy and endocrine therapy are insensitive, making chemotherapy an important part in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.
In 1982, Frei proposed the concept of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which is to apply chemotherapy before surgery for malignant tumors. Chemotherapy can reduce the size of tumors to some extent, even eliminate micrometastases, detect the sensitivity of chemotherapy drugs, and create opportunities for patients to have breast-conserving or surgical treatment. For triple-negative breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with synchronous combination of anthracyclines and taxanes or intensive sequential combination of anthracyclines and taxanes is the first choice. Simultaneously, chemotherapeutic drugs such as platinum, albumin, and paclitaxel as well as poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors can be added according to the patient's condition. However, during neoadjuvant therapy, a CT or MRI test is needed to monitor the patient's condition, so if there is any deterioration, to consider changing the treatment plan or immediately performing surgery is necessary. However, because of the need for multiple imaging examinations during neoadjuvant therapy, which increases the medical costs, to explore a low cost inspection method is necessary.
Circulating tumor cells are a new type of tumor molecular marker. Circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood originate from breast cancer (primary and metastatic lesions) shedding. Detection of these circulating tumor cells may monitor the therapeutic effect on breast cancer. The cost of detecting circulating tumor cells is much lower than that of conventional PET-CT, which can noticeably reduce medical expenses of patients. However, there is no clinical study on the changes of circulating tumor cells and the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer in and outside China. This study aims to explore the correlation between the changes of circulating tumor cells and the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer, and to compare the time intervals between the changes of circulating tumor cells and the changes of efficacy in patients with different sensitivities of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, so as to provide experimental evidence for predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy by observing the changes of circulating tumor cells in clinic.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 200
- triple-negative breast cancer confirmed by breast biopsy;
- stage III breast cancer (IIIA-C) assessed by CT or MRI;
- neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
- informed consent of patients and their family members.
- use of second-line chemotherapy regimen;
- bilateral breast cancer;
- inflammatory breast cancer;
- pregnant or breast-feeding;
- distant metastasis;
- a history of other cancers or chest radiotherapy;
- a history of abnormal blood test or other infectious symptoms.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Sensitivity group Taxanes or/and anthracycline-based therapy 100 patients will be assigned into sensitivity group according to the actual situation of them. Drug resistance group Taxanes or/and anthracycline-based therapy 100 patients will be assigned into drug resistance according to the actual situation of them.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy At 18 weeks The efficacy will be evaluated by the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) score, which is based on CT or X-ray results. (1) Complete response (CR): disappearance of all lesions; (2) partial response (PR): 30% decrease in sum of all target lesions in longest axis measurement; (3) stable disease (SD): the sum of the longest diameter of all lesions decreases but does not reach PR or increases but does not reach PD; (4) progressive disease (PD): 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter or appearance of new lesions. SD: One or more non-target lesions and/or tumor markers are higher than normal and persistent.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Detection of circulating tumor cells At 3 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy At 3 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 2.5 ml of blood will be taken from median elbow vein of upper arm, and the number of circulating tumor cells is ≤ 2 or CD133 ≤ 1.
Miller-Payne grading score Before and 18 weeks after chemotherapy The Miller-Payne grading system is as follows: Grade 1: no reduction in overall cellularity; grade 2: up to 30% reduction of cellularity; grade 3: between an estimated 30% and 90% reduction in tumor cellularity; grade 4: a marked disappearance of more than 90% of tumor cells; grade 5: no invasive malignant cells identifiable in sections from the site of the tumor, but ductal carcinoma in situ may be present.
Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy At 6 and 12 weeks The efficacy will be evaluated by the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) score, which is based on CT or X-ray results. (1) Complete response (CR): disappearance of all lesions; (2) partial response (PR): 30% decrease in sum of all target lesions in longest axis measurement; (3) stable disease (SD): the sum of the longest diameter of all lesions decreases but does not reach PR or increases but does not reach PD; (4) progressive disease (PD): 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter or appearance of new lesions. SD: One or more non-target lesions and/or tumor markers are higher than normal and persistent.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute
🇨🇳Shengyang, Liaoning, China
Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University
🇨🇳Shenyang, Liaoning, China