MedPath

Low-Energy Ultrasound, Electrical and Magnetic Field Stimulation in Therapy-Resistant Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Myofascial Pain Syndrome - Lower Back
Myofascial Pain Syndrome - Tension Headache
Myofascial Pain Syndrome - Neck
Registration Number
NCT05851326
Lead Sponsor
Sobet AG
Brief Summary

Sonodyn is an investigational device that within this clinical investigation is intended for use in patients suffering from low back pain, tension headache or neck pain, originating from therapy-resistant myofascial pain syndrome.

Myofascial pain syndrome is a prevalent pain condition in the adult population and a common cause of pain and dysfunction in the musculoskeletal system. It is a trigger point-induced regional musculoskeletal pain disorder affecting one or more muscles or groups of muscles.

Sonodyn is a handheld medical device that combines low-energy ultrasound, electrical and magnetic field stimulation for non-invasive transcutaneous treatment of chronic myofascial pain syndrome. Sonodyn is a battery-operated, rechargeable stimulation device to be placed over specific trigger points for associated pain patterns in the human body. It emits ultrasound, electrical and magnetic stimulation signals with a pre-defined set of parameters for each of the independently operated power sources.

The study will follow a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind parallel group design. It will be conducted as a multi-center investigation at 6 sites in Austria and Switzerland. Patients are randomized in a 2:1 ratio into Treatment and Control.

* Active Sonodyn therapy (Treatment)

* No therapy (Sham Control)

Two types of Sonodyn devices will be used: a fully functional one for Therapy arm patients that can deliver stimulation, and a non-functional one for Control arm patients that cannot convey any energy signals to the device output. The devices will look fully identical.

Randomization will be stratified by study site, pain diagnosis and sex of the patient.

For each subject, after a screening phase of 1 week, patients will be treated for 3 weeks with a follow-up of additional 8 weeks, adding up to 12 weeks. During treatment patients will activate their device 3 times a day for 10 minutes each.

During screening, treatment and follow-up period, all patients will twice per day report the average and maximum intensity of their pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Patients will also enter the date, amount, and time of intake of rescue medication, if applicable.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the impact on pain. Secondary objectives are to compare the performance between active therapy and sham, as well as to correlate changes in pain intensity with other pain related scales.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
126
Inclusion Criteria
  • Male or female aged 18 to 99 years at screening

  • Patient has an understanding of the study and its procedures, agrees to its provisions, and gives written informed consent prior to any study-related procedures

  • Patient is suffering from one of the following chronic pain conditions originating from myofascial pain:

    • low back pain
    • tension headache
    • neck pain

having been persisting for a minimum of 3 months and where myofascial pain syndrome is the pre-dominant cause for pain.

  • Patient is constant with respect to pain treatment for 1 week during the screening phase
  • A daily average NRS >= 4 on 4 out of 7 days in the screening phase
  • Compliance with the daily status reporting requirements as demonstrated
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with active implants
  • Allergy against rescue medication used during the study
  • Pregnancy
  • Mental or physical impairments that represent a source of risk for handling the device
  • Patients with cerebral spams (epilepsy)
  • Patients with psychiatric diseases or somatoform pain disorders
  • Patients with oral morphine equivalent of more than 120mg daily dose
  • Patients taking centrally acting muscle relaxants like Sirdalud or benzodiacepines
  • Patients with a contraindication against NSAID's
  • Presence of artificial joints made from methylmethacrylate or polyethylene at stimulation site
  • Presence of ferromagnetic metal implants at stimulation site, especially aneurysm clips, dental implants, etc.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)3 weeks

Change in Treatment group from Baseline to EoT in average Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain that the patient had ever experienced) per day

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Average and maximum NRS - Baseline to end of follow-up11 weeks

Change from Baseline to end of follow-up in average and maximum NRS in both groups

AUC of average and maximum NRS - Baseline to EoT3 weeks

Baseline-adjusted area under the curve (AUC) of average and maximum NRS from Baseline to EoT in both groups

Average and maximum NRS - Follow-up8 weeks

Average and maximum NRS during follow-up in both groups

Quality of sleep11 weeks

Quality of sleep questionnaire from Baseline to EoT and end of follow-up

Socioeconomic data4 weeks

Change in socioeconomic data from Screening to EoT

Maximum NRS - Baseline to EoT3 weeks

Change from Baseline to EoT in maximum NRS in both groups

Difference in average NRS between groups - Baseline to EoT3 weeks

Difference between groups in change of average NRS from Baseline to EoT

EQ-5D-5L11 weeks

EQ-5D-5L questionnaire from Baseline to EoT and end of follow-up

Medication consumption11 weeks

Pain and rescue medication consumption during treatment and follow-up phase in both groups

Trial Locations

Locations (6)

Schmerzambulanz, Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen Graz

🇦🇹

Graz, Austria

Abteilung für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee

🇦🇹

Klagenfurt, Austria

Krankenhaus St. Vinzenz Zams

🇦🇹

Zams, Austria

RSB Neurochirurgie AG, Salem-Spital Bern

🇨🇭

Bern, Switzerland

Clinique de la Douleur, La Tour Hospital

🇨🇭

Meyrin, Switzerland

Schmerzklinik Zürich AG

🇨🇭

Zürich, Switzerland

Schmerzambulanz, Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen Graz
🇦🇹Graz, Austria
Michael Kern, Dr.
Principal Investigator
Julia Kolb, Dr.
Sub Investigator

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.