Comparison of Total Knee Arthroplasties With Oxidized Zirconium and Cobalt Chromium Femoral Components
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Interventions
- Device: Zirconium (Zirconium Genesis II)Device: Cobalt-Chrome (Cobalt Chrome Genesis II)
- Registration Number
- NCT01336595
- Lead Sponsor
- Ewha Womans University
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if there are any clinical or radiographic differences in cemented total knee arthroplasty with an oxidized zirconium and a cobalt-chromium femoral knee component.
- Detailed Description
Although it has been claimed that total knee arthroplasties with an oxidized zirconium femoral knee component had beneficial wear properties in vitro, there are conflicting clinical results. The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical, subjective, and radiographic results as well as the weight, size and shape of polyethylene wear particles in the patients with an oxidized zirconium and a cobalt-chromium femoral knee component.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 331
- End-stage osteoarthritis of the knee joint requiring total knee arthroplasty with bilateral disease
- Inflammatory disease
- patient with other Lower extremity disease which may affect functional outcome
- Neurologic disease effecting patients lower extremity
- Revision surgery
- Patient not medically cleared for bilateral surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Zirconium Femoral Component Zirconium (Zirconium Genesis II) Oxidized zirconium femoral component of Genesis II TKR system is used. Cobalt Chrome Cobalt-Chrome (Cobalt Chrome Genesis II) Cobalt-Chromium Femoral component of Genesis II system is used.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Improvement in Knee Society Knee Score Initial(one day before surgery), and at 3 months, 1 year, then annually after surgery change in knee score will be compared with initial score, until mean follow up of 20 years.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Improvement in the range of motion Initial(one day before surgery), and at 3 months, 1 year, then annually after surgery change in the range of motion of knee joint will be compared with the initial value, until mean follow up of 20 years.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hosptial
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of