MedPath

Addition of sulfalasazine to chemotherapy for the treatment of AML in the elderly

Phase 1/2
Recruiting
Conditions
Recently diagnosed non favorable Acute Myeloid Leukemias
Registration Number
2024-513084-38-00
Lead Sponsor
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Paris
Brief Summary

Phase I

To assess the safety, characterize the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and identify the maximal tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of the combination of Sulfasalazine (SSZ) with Idarubicin (IDA) and Cytarabine (AraC) in patients with newly diagnosed non-favorable AML.

Probability of DLT should not exceed 33% at the end of the induction cycle (EOI) of IDA-AraC + SSZ treatment (up to Day 42).

Phase II

To assess preliminarily the anti-leukemia efficacy of the combination of IDA-AraC + SSZ, mainly in phase II, in newly diagnosed non-favorable AML with reference from historical data on complete remission rate, and MRD.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Ongoing, recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
64
Inclusion Criteria

Patients aged 60 years or older

With newly diagnosed AML (short course treatment with hydroxyurea and or steroids is acceptable). Patients with AML secondary to an antecedent Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) or Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) are eligible, as those with therapy-related AML.

Eligible for intensive chemotherapy in the investigator’s opinion

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry detected at screening allowing and / or compatible with MFCM-based MRD monitoring defined according to ELN criteria (Phase II only)

ECOG performance status ≤2

AST and ALT ≤3.0 x upper the limit of normal (ULN) and total and direct serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN unless considered due to leukemia

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥ 50 mL/min according to the MDRD equation

Written informed consent obtained prior to any screening procedures

Eligible for National Health Insurance in France.

Exclusion Criteria

Myeloid Sarcoma with < 20% bone marrow blasts

History of allergic reaction to idarubicin or idarubicin excipients

History of allergic reaction to cytarabine or cytarabine excipients

Known glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency

Known acute intermittent porphyria or porphyria variegata

Uncontrolled systemic fungal, bacterial, or viral infection (defined as ongoing signs/symptoms related to the infection without improvement despite appropriate treatment).

Other uncontrolled or active malignant disease within prior 12 months (excluding myelodysplastic syndrome; cutaneous basal cell carcinoma, “in-situ” carcinoma of the cervix or breast, or other local malignancy excised).

Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or HIV-related malignancy

Clinically active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection

Inability to swallow

Known malabsorption syndrome or other condition that may significantly impair absorption of oral study medications

Patient who has received a vaccine injection with live-attenuated virus in the last three weeks

Participation in another therapeutic interventional clinical study within 30 days of enrolment

Administration of any therapy considered investigational (i.e., used for non-approved indications(s) or in the context of a research investigation) within 5 drug half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of study drug

Previous treatment by anthracyclines

Any contraindication to use anthracyclines including uncontrolled coronary disease, severe renal failure, severe hepatic failure, recent myocardial infarction, symptomatic congestive heart failure, severe cardiomyopathy, significant arrhythmia as estimated by the investigator or LVEF <53% as assessed by echocardiography or MUGA, anterior treatment by idarubicin and/or anthracyclines and anthracènediones beyond the maximum cumulative dose

Any contraindication to use cytarabine including degenerative and toxic encephalopathy

Any condition requiring treatment with digoxin

Any of concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical condition, which could compromise participation in the study

Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding

In a man whose sexual partner is a woman of childbearing potential, unwillingness or inability of the man or woman to use a highly effective contraceptive method for the entire treatment period and for at least 6 months after completion of protocol treatment. Highly effective contraception methods include: combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal methods associated with inhibition of ovulation, intra-uterine device; surgical sterilization (including bilateral tubal occlusion, partner’s vasectomy) or sexual abstinence if this is the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient. Male patients must not freeze or donate sperm starting at screening and throughout the treatment period and 3 months after the administration of the final dose of study medication.

In a heterosexually active woman of childbearing potential, unwillingness or inability to use a highly effective contraceptive method (as described above) for the entire treatment period and for at least 6 months after the administration of the final dose of study medication. Women are not regarded as of childbearing potential if they are post-menopausal (at least 2 years without menses) or are surgically sterile (at least 1 month before enrollment). Female patients must not donate or retrieve, for their own use, ova from the time of screening and throughout the treatment period, and for 12 weeks after the administration of the final dose of study medication. Female patients must agree not to breastfeed from the time of screening and throughout the protocol period, and for (5 1/2 lives) days after the administration of the final dose of study medication.

Proven central nervous system leukemic involvement

Adults subjects to a legal protection order or unable to give their consent

Persons deprived of their freedom by judicial or administrative decision, person hospitalized without their consent by virtues of articles L 3212-1 and L3213-1 and who are not subject to the provisions of article L 1121

Favorable risk cytogenetics: t(15;17), t(8;21), inv(16) or t(16;16) or presence of PML-RARA, RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcript

Presence of FLT3-ITD or TKD mandating treatment with midostaurin.

Concurrent therapy with any cytotoxic drug within 3 weeks before the first study dose. Only hydroxyurea for the control of blood counts is permitted

Patients planned to received CPX-351 for myelodysplasia-related changes or therapy-related AML

Previous treatment with sulfasalazine in the last 5 years or ongoing treatment with sulfasalazine or 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) for ulcerative colitis or inflammatory rheumatisms.

History of allergy SSZ, one of its metabolites (5-aminosalicylic acid, 5-ASA) or mesalazine, other sulfonylarylamines sulfonamides or salicylates, or sulfasalazine excipients

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Phase I : Documentation during the dose escalation of dose limiting toxicity (DLT)

Phase I : Documentation during the dose escalation of dose limiting toxicity (DLT)

Phase I : Identification of a maximal tolerated dose (MTD) anticipated to be the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) - MTD is defined by a target DLT rate of 33%, assessed during the dose escalation phase by a continual reassessment method - RP2D is anticipated to be the MTD. However, it could be equal to one dose level lower than the MTD. It will be determined in interaction with the DSMB, insofar that this dose level is validated by PK/PD studies and efficacy preliminary data.

Phase I : Identification of a maximal tolerated dose (MTD) anticipated to be the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) - MTD is defined by a target DLT rate of 33%, assessed during the dose escalation phase by a continual reassessment method - RP2D is anticipated to be the MTD. However, it could be equal to one dose level lower than the MTD. It will be determined in interaction with the DSMB, insofar that this dose level is validated by PK/PD studies and efficacy preliminary data.

Phase II : MRD-negative Complete Response at EOI (day 28-42) per ELN 2022 Criteria

Phase II : MRD-negative Complete Response at EOI (day 28-42) per ELN 2022 Criteria

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assessment of safety - Safety outcome measures will be assessed continuously during the study. Monitoring of ECGs and clinical laboratory values are integral to safety assessment. Adverse events (AE), treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) and treatment-related TEAEs will be evaluated according to the NCI CTCAE version 5.0.

Assessment of safety - Safety outcome measures will be assessed continuously during the study. Monitoring of ECGs and clinical laboratory values are integral to safety assessment. Adverse events (AE), treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) and treatment-related TEAEs will be evaluated according to the NCI CTCAE version 5.0.

Pharmacokinetics - To assess SSZ and its metabolites, IDA (and its metabolite) and AraC. This will allow to determine a PK model for SSZ at an early and late time point and confirm the lack of interaction between SSZ and IDA or AraC.

Pharmacokinetics - To assess SSZ and its metabolites, IDA (and its metabolite) and AraC. This will allow to determine a PK model for SSZ at an early and late time point and confirm the lack of interaction between SSZ and IDA or AraC.

Pharmacodynamics - Pharmacodynamic assays aim at demonstrating ROS induction upon SSZ exposure relative to pre-treatment levels.

Pharmacodynamics - Pharmacodynamic assays aim at demonstrating ROS induction upon SSZ exposure relative to pre-treatment levels.

Antileukemia activity - Response at EOI assessment (day 28-42) per ELN 2022 Criteria.

Antileukemia activity - Response at EOI assessment (day 28-42) per ELN 2022 Criteria.

Antileukemia activity - Survival assessment at 12 months

Antileukemia activity - Survival assessment at 12 months

Trial Locations

Locations (10)

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Paris

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Centre Hospitalier De Versailles

🇫🇷

Le Chesnay Rocquencourt, France

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Caen Normandie

🇫🇷

Caen Cedex 9, France

Hospices Civils De Lyon

🇫🇷

Pierre Benite, France

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Nice

🇫🇷

Nice, France

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens Picardie

🇫🇷

Amiens Cedex 1, France

Institut Gustave Roussy

🇫🇷

Villejuif, France

Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire De Tours

🇫🇷

Tours, France

Centre Hospitalier Regional De Marseille

🇫🇷

Marseille, France

Centre Henri Becquerel

🇫🇷

Rouen Cedex, France

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Paris
🇫🇷Paris, France
Mathieu Leclerc
Site contact
0149812057
mathieu.leclerc@aphp.fr
Justine Decroocq
Site contact
0158412131
justine.decroocq@aphp.fr
Thorsten Braun
Site contact
0148957051
thorsten.braun@aphp.fr
Raphael Itzykson
Site contact
0142499643
raphael.itzykson@aphp.fr

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.