跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04151888
NCT04151888Unknown不适用

Evaluation of Nasal Hot Water Irrigation in the Management of Posterior Epistaxis

Assiut University0 个研究点目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2020年1月30日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
20
主要终点
Effect of hot water irrigation in management of posterior epistaxis

研究概览

简要总结

This study was aimed to assess the efficacy and factors affecting the success of hot water irrigation in management of posterior epistaxis.

详细描述

Epistaxis has been reported to occur in up to 60% of general population.This condition has incidence peaks at ages younger than 10 years and older than 50 years. Epistaxis appears to occur more in males than females . In rare cases massive nasal bleeding can lead to death.

Nasal bleeding usually responds to first aid measures such as compression.When Epistaxis doesn't respond to simple measures. The source of bleeding should be located and treated appropriately. Treatment options to be considered include topical vasoconstriction, chemical cautery, electrocautery, nasal packing, posterior gauze packing, use of balloon system, and arterial ligation or embolization. Hospital admission should be considered with patients with comorbid conditions or complication of blood loss.

Nasal Hot water irrigation was first described by Guice in 1878 as an effective method of treating severe life-threatening epistaxis. However, the technique was already in use by nineteenth century obstetricians as a method of treating postpartum bleeding . In the second half of the twenties century, nasal packing products and the development of endoscopic sinus surgery almost completely replaced the irrigation technique as treatment for posterior epistaxis. However, Stangerup et al. (1996) have demonstrated that hot water irrigation, using temperatures of up to 50°C, produces vasodilation and oedema of the nasal mucosa without the risk of necrosis and accelerating the clotting cascade.

Hot water irrigation had a higher success rate (55 %) in treating posterior epistaxis, compared with nasal packing (44 %) .Using a modified irrigation technique, was able to stop bleeding permanently in up to 82 %of cases of posterior epistaxis, including patients receiving antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants . During a follow-up period of four to 24 months. Furthermore, successful hot water irrigation was associated with less nasal trauma, significantly less pain, fewer surgical procedures and avoidance of a hospital stay.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Other
时间视角
Other

入排标准

年龄范围
10 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • patients age: > 10 years.
  • Failed first aid measures.

排除标准

  • Patients age < 10 years old.
  • Patients with anterior epistaxis.
  • Patients presented with hemorrhagic shock.
  • Patients presented with post-surgical bleeding.
  • Suspected nasal pathology e.g tumors or trauma.

结局指标

主要结局

Effect of hot water irrigation in management of posterior epistaxis

时间窗: 2 years

Observation of the patients for 24 hrs after controlling of posterior epistaxis using hot water irrigation if it can control posterior epistaxis or not and this will be confirmed by using coagulation profile and complete blood count

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

RT Fahmy

Resident doctor

Assiut University

相似试验