Evaluation of composite resin restorations and glass ionomer cement by applying differently the adhesive system
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- K03.8Excessive attrition of teeth. Abrasion of teeth. Other specified diseases of hard tissues of teeth.K03.0K03.1
- Registration Number
- RBR-655c3z
- Lead Sponsor
- niversidade Estadual Paulista - Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Data analysis completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
Age between 18 and 90 years old; regardless of genre; good health; no clinical history of allergies to dental products and remedies; presence of at least 4 non-carious cervical lesions; proper oral hygiene.
Exclusion Criteria
Chronic systemic disease; periodontal disease and without treatment; use of orthodontic appliances; severe bruxism, with more than 50% of wear.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Intervention
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Expected outcome 1: It was expected that there would be no statistically significant difference between the four adhesive strategies used using the USPHS (United State Public Health Service) method through visual and tactile inspection, considering a variation of at least 5% in the measurements after the intervention (initial), 12 and 24 months.;Outcome found 1: The four different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical restorations presented similar clinical performance after the intervention (initial), 12 and 24 months.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Expected Outcome 2: It was expected that there would be no statistically significant difference between the evaluated times, when the same adhesive strategy was evaluated using the USPHS (United State Public Health Service) method through visual and tactile inspection, considering a variation of at least 5% in measurements immediately after the intervention (initial), 12 and 24 months.;Outcome found 2: For each adhesion strategy in non-carious cervical restorations, there was no change in clinical performance after the intervention (initial), 12 and 24 months.