PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF THE TRACHEO-OESOPHAGEAL VOICE: ITALIAN VALIDATION OF THE SUNDERLAND TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL PERCEPTUAL SCALE (I-SToPS)
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 55
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Reliability
研究概览
简要总结
Aim of this study was to validate the Sunderland Tracheoesophageal Perceptual Scale (SToPS) in Italian language by checking the inter- and intra-rater reliability.
The validation of the tool involved the following steps: 1) Translation and adaptation of the SToPS into Italian language; 2) Recruitment of participants (43 laryngectomized patients with a voice prosthesis and 12 health professionals - 6 speech and language therapists (SLTs) and 6 Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENTs) surgeons - classified into experienced or not at assessing voice; 3) Recording of patients' speech samples; 4) Perceptual evaluation of recorded speech samples (test and re-test) performed by the 12 health professionals; 5) Statistical analysis (quadratic weighted Cohen Kappa and weighted Kappa of Light coefficients).
SLTs with specific experience in tracheo-esophageal and laryngeal voice rated more reliably than the others raters. For all groups of raters, the inter-rater agreement was worse than the intra-rater one for 9/10 parameters. Exclusively for experienced SLTs, only the "Impairment of social acceptability" parameter reached a good level of inter-rater agreement.
In conclusion, the Italian version of SToPS can be considered a reliable tool. As in the original version, expert SLTs may be considered the optimal judges for tracheoesophageal voice assessment.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Diagnostic
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •native Italian speakers;
- •ability to produce TE voice.
排除标准
- •reading difficulties;
- •presence or suspicion of disease recurrence;
- •other communication problems not related to Total laryngectomy.
研究组 & 干预措施
laryngectomized patients
干预措施: voice recording (Other)
health professionals
干预措施: perceptual assessment of the recorded voice sample (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Reliability
时间窗: 4 months
The primary aim of this study was to carry out a psychometric validation in Italian of a perceptual evaluation scale for use by clinicians. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of each parameter was analyzed with Cohen's kappa weighted quadratic statistic. A weighted average kappa coefficient equal to or greater than 0.61 has been considered a "good" level of agreement.
次要结局
- Training(4 months)
研究者
D'Alatri Lucia
Prof
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
