Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01534481
NCT01534481
Completed
Phase 3

Neurodevelopmental Effects of Donor Human Milk vs. Preterm Formula in Extremely Low Birth Weight (ELBW) Infants

NICHD Neonatal Research Network17 sites in 1 country483 target enrollmentAugust 2012

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Infant, Newborn
Sponsor
NICHD Neonatal Research Network
Enrollment
483
Locations
17
Primary Endpoint
Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) Cognitive Composite Score
Status
Completed
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The Milk Trial seeks to determine the effect on neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 22-26 months of donor human milk as compared to preterm infant formula as the in-hospital diet for infants whose mothers choose not to provide breast milk or are able to provide only a minimal amount. Infants will be randomized to receive donor breast milk or formula during their hospital stay. Infant's will be followed until they reach 22-26 months of age.

Detailed Description

There is strong evidence that maternal breast milk feedings in infancy confer multiple health benefits in the extremely preterm population (extremely low birth weight, ELBW, \<1000 g). Studies suggest an IQ advantage of up to 8 points conferred by maternal milk feeding in this population. Rates of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis are also lower in human milk fed ELBW infants, and they experience shorter hospital stays and fewer re-hospitalizations in the first year of life. When mothers choose not to or are unable to provide milk, preterm formula is usually used. Recently, pasteurized donor human milk is available in some NICUs in the US as an alternative to preterm formula. Donor milk has not been well studied with regard to its safety and efficacy. It is unknown if donor human milk confers the same benefits as maternal milk with regard to neurodevelopmental and health outcomes. The proposed study will be the first US multicenter randomized trial of the health and developmental effects of donor milk as compared to preterm formula in ELBW infants receiving little or no maternal milk. Our long-term goal is to optimize neurodevelopmental and health outcomes for ELBW infants, maximizing their quality of life and societal functionality throughout their lives. If donor human milk has similar effects to maternal milk, the public health benefit of donor milk feedings in ELBW infants unable to receive maternal milk would be considerable.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 2012
End Date
November 30, 2021
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
NICHD Neonatal Research Network
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Gestational age less than 29 weeks.
  • Admitted to the NICU at less than or equal to 72 hours of life
  • Survived at least 12 hours

Exclusion Criteria

  • Chromosomal anomalies
  • Cyanotic congenital heart disease
  • Diagnosed intrauterine infection
  • Other congenital disorders known to impair neurodevelopment
  • NEC or IP prior to seeking consent
  • Decision documented to limit intensive care therapies
  • Congenital disorders that may affect feeding
  • Feeding Group Eligibility:
  • Sole Diet Group: Infants will be eligible for the sole diet feeding protocol if the mother declines to provide breast milk for the baby.
  • Supplemental Diet (minimal maternal milk) Group: Infants whose mothers initially choose to provide breast milk and begin pumping will be re-screened for eligibility at least weekly until the infant is 21 days old. If the mother stops expressing milk at any point prior to the infant's 21st day of life, her infant will be eligible for randomization. In addition, those whose mothers are providing less than 20% of the infant's dietary needs (averaged over past 5 days) when the infant reaches 21 days of age will be eligible for randomization at this point. No infant will be randomized after reaching 21 days.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) Cognitive Composite Score

Time Frame: At 22-26 months corrected age

Mean cognitive composite score (standardized mean 100, SD 15, range 54-145). Subjects who died prior to follow-up assigned the score of 54. (lower scores indicating greater impairment)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in Weight-for-age Z-score During Study(During Study Intervention, the time between study randomization and discontinuation of study protocol. Infants exited from the study protocol 1-2 weeks prior to anticipated hospital discharge or 120 days, whichever is sooner)
  • Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) Motor Composite Score(At 22-26 months corrected age)
  • Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy(At 22-26 months corrected age)
  • Total Deaths Before Discharge(From day of randomization to Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 1 year following birth)
  • Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) Language Composite Score(At 22-26 months corrected age)
  • Late Onset Sepsis (LOS)(From birth to Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth)
  • Death or Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC)(From birth to Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth)
  • Profound Impairment(At 22-26 months corrected age)
  • Death or Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)(At 22-26 months corrected age)
  • Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC)(From birth to Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth)
  • Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI).(At 22-26 months corrected age)

Study Sites (17)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials