MedPath

Prevention of Phantom Limb Pain After Transtibial Amputation

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Phantom Limb Pain
Prevention
Chronic Pain
Registration Number
NCT01626755
Lead Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Brief Summary

Phantom limb pain following amputation is a major problem. Current evidence how to best prevent phantom limb pain is equivocal because previous trials have included small numbers of patients, and tested heterogeneous patient collectives. There is some evidence that optimized perioperative pain control is effective in preventing phantom limb pain, but the potential added role of regional anesthesia has not been defined.

Objective:

The Aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that sciatic nerve block decreases the point prevalence of phantom limb pain 12 months after transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease compared to optimized intravenous pain therapy.

Study design:

Randomized, prospective, double-blind (patient, physician, statistician) clinical trial. All patients will receive standard optimized intravenous anesthesia and analgesia (opiate patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), intravenous ketamine). Patients in the intervention group will receive additional infusion of local anesthetic via a sciatic nerve catheter placed under ultrasound guidance.

Main outcome of this study:

Point prevalence of chronic phantom limb pain after 12 months.

Detailed Description

Rationale:

Phantom limb pain following amputation is a major clinical problem. Current evidence how to best prevent phantom limb pain is equivocal because previous trials have included small numbers of patients, and tested heterogeneous patient collectives. There is some evidence that optimized perioperative pain control is effective in preventing phantom limb pain, but the potential added role of regional anesthesia has not been defined.

Objective:

The Aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that sciatic nerve block decreases the point prevalence of phantom limb pain 12 months after transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease compared to optimized intravenous pain therapy.

Study design:

Randomized, prospective, double-blind (patient, physician, statistician) clinical trial. All patients will receive standard optimized intravenous anesthesia and analgesia (opiate patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), intravenous ketamine). Patients in the intervention group will receive additional infusion of local anesthetic via a sciatic nerve catheter placed under ultrasound guidance.

Study population:

Patients undergoing elective transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease at one of the participating centres, ASA status II to IV.

Intervention:

Infusion of local anesthetic via sciatic nerve catheter placed under ultrasound guidance.

Main study parameter/endpoint:

Point prevalence of chronic phantom limb pain after 12 months.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:

All patients, regardless of group allocation, will receive optimalized intravenous pain treatment. The aim of this study is to assess whether additional regional anesthesia (ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block) can decrease the incidence of phantom limb pain. The working hypothesis is that patients undergoing intervention treatment (optimized intravenous therapy plus nerve block) are expected to feature a decreased incidence of phantom limb pain at 12 months, in addition to improved perioperative analgesia.

The administration of both optimalized intravenous pain treatment and peripheral nerve blockade is routine clinical practice for many procedures on the lower leg, including amputation. The risk of this intervention can be described as very low. In control patients, the sciatic catheter will be used for rescue pain treatment.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
12
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients undergoing elective transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease
  • age over 18 years
  • American Society of Anaesthesiology status II to IV
Exclusion Criteria
  • contraindication to peripheral regional anesthesia
  • psychiatric disease
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding status
  • amputation for tumour surgery
  • traumatic amputation
  • inability to give written and informed consent.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Point prevalence of chronic phantom limb pain12 months after amputation
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (9)

Massachusetts General Hospital, Dept. of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

General Hospital Klagenfurt

🇦🇹

Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria

Innsbruck Medical University Hospital

🇦🇹

Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria

Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg

🇧🇪

Genk, Limburg, Belgium

Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam

🇳🇱

Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands

Westfriesgasthuis

🇳🇱

Hoorn, Noord-Holland, Netherlands

Erasmus Medical Center

🇳🇱

Rotterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands

Canisius Wilhelmus Ziekenhuis

🇳🇱

Nijmegen, Netherlands

Valencia University Hospital

🇪🇸

Valencia, Spain

Massachusetts General Hospital, Dept. of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.