Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00526994
NCT00526994
Completed
Phase 2

Randomized Controlled Trial of Routine Screening for Intimate Partner Violence

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention1 site in 1 country2,700 target enrollmentMay 2008

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Quality of Life
Sponsor
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Enrollment
2700
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Quality of Life, Physical Health Composite
Status
Completed
Last Updated
12 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This is a randomized controlled trial with three arms to establish the impact of screening and referral to services for women disclosing exposure to IPV.

Detailed Description

Approximately 2675 women\* will be enrolled and randomized to one of 3 arms. In the first arm, participants will be screened, and if disclosing IPV, will receive information on available resources in the community. In arms two and three, participants will not be screened, but one group will receive information on available resources in the community and the other will not. All three groups will be assessed for quality of life (SF-12;standardized and validated scale with 12 questions that measure overall health (1 item), physical functioning (2 items), role limitations due to physical health problems (4 items), bodily pain (1 item), energy/fatigue (1 item), social functioning (1 item), psychological distress (1 item), and well being (1 item) in the past 4 weeks; items are summed to form a physical health composite scale and a mental health composite scale; each scale is standardized to have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 for the U.S. population with a possible range from 0 to 100; higher scores represent a better health state); disability; and utilization of health care and IPV services at baseline and at a 12 month follow-up. A pilot study, also using a randomized controlled trial design, will establish the feasibility, acceptability, and impact on disclosure rates, use of referral resources, and potential harms of three screening and referral strategies. \*sample size calculation based n needed to detect a standardized effect size of 0.3 with an α=.05 (1-tailed)and ß=.20 if there's a 20% IPV (+) rate and 30% lost-to-follow-up rate.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 2008
End Date
June 2011
Last Updated
12 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Female

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Joanne Klevens

epidemiologist

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • women attending obstetrics \& gynecology (OB-GYN), family planning, general medicine, family medicine or HIV/Sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic

Exclusion Criteria

  • non-English speaking other than Spanish speakers
  • accompanied by a child \>3 years of age without adequate provision for child care;
  • Visually- or hearing-impaired women;
  • without access to a telephone;
  • Severe Mental impairment

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Quality of Life, Physical Health Composite

Time Frame: at one-year follow-up

Assessed with Quality of Life SF-12 V.2 (Ware, Kosinski,Turner-Bowker, \& Gandek, 2002). This instrument has 12 items measuring eight subscales of mental and physical health-general health, physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, bodily pain, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, and mental health (psychological distress)-during the past 4 weeks. These subscales are combined to form a physical health composite scale and a mental health composite scale. Each scale is standardized to have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 for the U.S. population with a possible range from 0 to 100; higher scores represent a better health state.

Quality of Life, Mental Health Composite

Time Frame: past 30 days

Assessed with the Quality of Life SF-12 v.2 (Ware, Kosinski, Turner-Bowker, \& Gandek, 2002). This instrument has 12 items measuring eight subscales of mental and physical health-general health, physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, bodily pain, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, and mental health (psychological distress)-during the past 4 weeks. These subscales are combined to form a physical health composite scale and a mental health composite scale. Each scale is standardized to have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 for the U.S. population with a possible range from 0 to 100; higher scores represent a better health state.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Utilization of Health Care(during past year)
  • Disability(one year follow-up)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials