Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Idroflog® (Sodium Hyaluronate and Hydrocortisone) and Sodium Hyaluronate for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 130
- Locations
- 10
- Primary Endpoint
- Change From Baseline in fluorescein corneal Staining (Oxford Scale 0-5) between inclusion and 30 days
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This study aims at demonstrating the non-inferiority of Idroflog compared to sodium hyaluronate 0.18% for the disease improvement of people with documented history of dry eyes and use of tear substitutes for at least 3 months.
Detailed Description
This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, assessor-blinded, non-inferiority trial comparing Idroflog® (sodium hyaluronate and hydrocortisone) with sodium hyaluronate in participants with dry eye disease (DED).
DED is a common, multifactorial ocular condition, which affects between 5% and 35% of adults worldwide and significantly affects their quality of life. DED treatment is based on the management of contributing factors (local environment, elimination of harmful systemic and topical drugs), eyelid hygiene and the use of artificial tears. The gold standard of the latter is sodium hyaluronate solutions, which, however, lack any anit-inflammatory activity necessary for DED's management. In comparison to these, Idroflog containing both sodium hyaluronate and hydrocortisone in addition to the usual activities of sodium hyaluronate artificial tears (diluent, diffusive, protective, nutrient, lubricant) also provides steroidal anti-inflammatory activity. Therefore, this study aims at showing that Idroflog® performs as well as current standard of care (sodium hyaluronate artificial tears) in the treatment of moderate DED, while providing a potential benefit on the control of the sub-clinical inflammatory component of DED and maintaining the excellent safety profile of sodium hyaluronate artificial tears treatment.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description
In order to maintain the blinding of the Investigator and his team, both products will be placed into identical boxes ("blinding-box"), identified only by a randomization number, without any indication of product identity or randomization arm.
Each patient will be randomly assigned a randomization number, allocating him/her to either Idroflog® or Sodium Hyaluronate 0.18% (1:1) in accordance with a central randomisation table generated using a validated computer-program. Randomisation will be stratified per center and performed using a permuted random block design.
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
- •Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
- •Aged ≥ 18 years
- •Documented history of dry eyes and use of tear substitutes for at least 3 months within the last year
- •Presence of corneal fluorescein staining (Oxford Scale, Score ≥ 2) in at least one eye
- •Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) ≥ 23
- •Reduced tear break-up time (< 11 seconds)
Exclusion Criteria
- •Women who are pregnant or lactating
- •Best far corrected visual acuity < 1/10 in both eyes
- •Known hypersensitivity to one of the components of the study medications or test products
- •Use of any ocular topical medication other than the study medications for the treatment of ocular diseases including artificial tears during the study period
- •Ocular surgery (of any type, including laser surgery and punctal plugs) or ocular trauma within the 4 months prior to screening
- •Active ocular infection
- •Active allergies requiring treatment
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change From Baseline in fluorescein corneal Staining (Oxford Scale 0-5) between inclusion and 30 days
Time Frame: 0 to 30 days of treatment
Secondary Outcomes
- Safety 1: Changes in intraocular pressure between inclusion and 30, 60 and 90 days(0 to 30, 60 and 90 days of treatment)
- Change in OSDI between inclusion and 30, 60 and 90 days.(0 to 30, 60 and 90 days of treatment)
- Change in Tear Film Break Up Time between inclusion and 30, 60 and 90 days(0 to 30, 60 and 90 days of treatment)
- Change in Pentascore score between inclusion and 30, 60 and 90 days(0 to 30, 60 and 90 days of treatment)
- Safety 2: Changes in visual acuity between inclusion and 90 days(0 to 90 days of treatment)
- Change From Baseline in fluorescein corneal Staining (Oxford Scale 0-5) between inclusion and 60 days, and between inclusion and 90 days.(0 to 60 and 90 days of treatment)
- Changes in Ocular Redness Scale (0-4; 0 = no ocular redness, 4 = extremely severe ocular redness) between inclusion and 30, 60 and 90 days(0 to 30, 60 and 90 days of treatment)