MedPath

Hypofractionated vs Conventional RT After Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Breast Reconstruction
Radiation Oncology
Registration Number
NCT07084519
Lead Sponsor
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Brief Summary

This study investigates the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) in breast cancer patients undergoing total mastectomy with prosthetic reconstruction.

Study Design Population: Patients with high-risk breast cancer after mastectomy and immediate implant reconstruction.

Intervention:

HFRT Arm: 43.5 Gy in 15 fractions (2.9 Gy/fraction, 3 weeks). Control Arm: CFRT (50 Gy in 25 fractions, 2 Gy/fraction, 5 weeks). Endpoints Primary: Reconstruction failure rate (e.g., implant removal, capsular contracture)

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
190
Inclusion Criteria
  • Female, aged 18-75 years
  • Karnofsky Performance Status ≥60
  • Histopathologically confirmed invasive breast adenocarcinoma
  • Total mastectomy [with or without nipple-areolar complex preservation] + axillary dissection/sentinel lymph node biopsy + implant/expander placement R0 resection with negative margins
  • pT3 or N2-3 disease; or pT1-2N1
  • No distant metastasis
  • Completed standard neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy cycles
  • ≤8 weeks post-chemotherapy or ≤12 weeks post-surgery if no chemotherapy
  • Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Prior radiotherapy to chest wall or nodal regions
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • T4 stage disease
  • Pre-radiotherapy local/regional/distant metastasis
  • Grade ≥3 implant-related adverse events irreversible before radiotherapy
  • Bilateral breast cancer requiring bilateral radiotherapy
  • Concurrent/secondary malignancy with disease-free interval <5 years [except non-melanoma skin cancer, papillary/follicular thyroid cancer, or cervical carcinoma in situ]
  • Active collagen vascular disease, e.g., SLE, scleroderma
  • Uncontrolled comorbidities: acute cardiovascular disease, substance abuse, or psychiatric disorders

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Reconstruction Failure Rate2 year

implant removal, capsular contracture ≥ Baker grade III

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Other Implant-Related Adverse Events2 year

infection, skin necrosis, implant exposure

Radiation-Related Toxicities2 year

grade ≥3 dermatitis, pneumonitis, lymphedema

DFS5 year

Disease-Free Survival

OS5 year

Overall Survival

LRR5 year

Locoregional Recurrence Rate

DM5 year

Distant Metastasis Rate

Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Harvard Breast Cosmesis Scale (Physician-Rated)1 year

Physicians will assess cosmetic outcome using the Harvard Breast Cosmesis Scale.

Unit of Measure: Score on Harvard Breast Cosmesis Scale Scale Information: Score range from 1 (Excellent) to 4 (Poor). Higher scores indicate worse cosmetic outcomes.

Patient-Reported Cosmetic Outcome1 year

Description: Patients will self-assess cosmetic outcome using a 4-point Likert scale.

Unit of Measure: Score on 4-point Likert scale. Scale Information: Score range from 1 (Excellent) to 4 (Poor). Higher scores indicate worse perceived outcome.

Quality of Life Assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status ScoreBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) will be used to evaluate patients' global health status and overall quality of life.

Unit of Measure: Score on a scale Scale Information: Score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better global health status.

Quality of Life Assessed by EORTC QLQ-BR23 Breast Cancer ModuleBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment

The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-BR23) will be used to assess breast cancer-specific quality of life.

Unit of Measure: Score on a scale Scale Information: Score ranges from 0 to 100. For functional scales, higher scores indicate better function; for symptom scales, higher scores indicate worse symptoms.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College

🇨🇳

Beijing, Province, China

Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
🇨🇳Beijing, Province, China
Shulian Wang, MD
Contact
8810-87787659
wangsl@cicams.ac.cn

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.