Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01174316
NCT01174316
Withdrawn
Not Applicable

Autotitrating Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) Versus Standard NIV; a Randomised Crossover Trial in Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Respiratory Failure

ResMed1 site in 1 countryAugust 2010

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Respiratory Failure
Sponsor
ResMed
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
pH at 1+ hour
Status
Withdrawn
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and tolerance of autotitrating non-invasive ventilation (NIV) versus standard NIV in patients admitted to hospital with acute exacerbation of chronic respiratory failure.

The investigators hypothesise that autotitrating NIV will ventilate patients with acute exacerbations of chronic respiratory failure as effectively as standard NIV.

Detailed Description

The aim of the study is to compare the effect of two types of noninvasive ventilator (a small machine that assists breathing) in patients admitted to hospital with a sudden worsening of their existing breathing insufficiency, including an increase of carbon dioxide in the blood (hypercapnia) and acidity of the blood. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is standard therapy for patients with acute hypercapnic exacerbations (sudden worsening of existing breathing insufficiency) of both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and nonCOPD patients. The most common type of NIV is bilevel pressure support which assists patient breathing by delivering different levels of air pressure during inspiration and expiration via a mask covering the nose or nose and mouth. Standard bilevel NIV (VPAP™) has been further developed to create a new automatically adjusting NIV (AutoVPAP™). Automatically adjusting NIV varies the inspiratory air pressure according to the airflow rates generated by the patient. This may improve patient comfort, hours of NIV use and recovery time. Patients over the age of 18 admitted to Royal Brompton Hospital respiratory ward will be considered for entry into this randomised crossover study. If eligible for inclusion and willing to take part patients will be setup on automatically adjusting NIV or standard NIV, assigned in random order. After 24 hours on the first NIV the patient will be swapped to the alternative NIV for a further 24 hours of treatment.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 2010
End Date
May 10, 2011
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
ResMed
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • patients admitted or transferred to Royal Brompton Hospital with acute exacerbation of chronic respiratory failure, or inpatients who suffer a deterioration in respiratory status, defined as 7.25 \< pH \< 7.35, PaCO2 \> 6.0kPa, and respiratory rate \> 20bpm

Exclusion Criteria

  • \< 18 years old
  • pH \< 7.25
  • need for immediate intubation
  • uncontrolled cardiac failure
  • hypotensive (systolic blood pressure \< 90mmHg)
  • acute myocardial infarction
  • acute dysrhythmia
  • other system failure (e.g. acute renal failure, liver failure)
  • moderate or severe bulbar weakness
  • inability to understand rationale and/or consent form for study

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

pH at 1+ hour

Time Frame: 1 hour

pH of arterial blood after 1 hour of treatment with non-invasive ventialtion compared baseline value

Secondary Outcomes

  • pH at 4+ hours(4+ hours of NIV treatment)
  • Respiratory Rate at 1+ hour(1+ hour of NIV treatment)
  • Respiratory rate at 4+ hours(4+ hours of NIV treatment)
  • overnight mean transcutaneous carbon dioxide(24 hours)
  • PaCO2 at 1+ hours(1+ hours of NIV treatment)
  • PaCO2 at 4+ hours(4+ hours of NIV treatment)
  • PaO2 at 1+ hour(1+ hour of NIV treatment)
  • PaO2 at 4+ hours(4+ hours of NIV treatment)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials