Naturally Banded Versus Synthetic Banding of Sleeve Gastrectomy
- Conditions
- Obesity, Morbid
- Interventions
- Procedure: silicone bandProcedure: natural band
- Registration Number
- NCT06298942
- Lead Sponsor
- Minia University
- Brief Summary
to compare banding sleeve gastrectomy using silicone ring Versus using natural flap ( round ligament of the liver)
- Detailed Description
to compare banding sleeve gastrectomy using silicone ring Versus using natural flap ( round ligament of the liver) as regard weight loss, complications rat and cost
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 250
- obese patients with BMI more than 40 with or without co-morbidity or more than 35 with co-morbidity
- patients fit for laparoscopic surgery
- give approval to share in the study
- patients refused to share in the study
- patients unfit for surgery
- patients aged less than 18 and older than 65
- patient with previous upper abdominal surgery either for obesity or other diseases
- revisional bariatric procedures
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description silicone band silicone band to use a synesthetic band with sleeve gastrectomy natural band natural band to use an round ligament as a natural band in stead of synesthetic band with sleeve gastrectomy
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method total cost 12 hours total operative cost in Egyptian pound (LE)
food intolerance 1 year food intolerance at one year food tolerance arabic score questionnaire
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method %EWL 1 year percentage of weight loss at one year measured as (initial weight - follow-up weight) / (initial weight - bodyweight at a BMI of 25 kg/ m2) x 100
improvement of comorbidities 1 year the incidence of improvement of comorbidities
complications rate 1 year the incidence of early and late complications according to Clavien-Dindo (CD)