MedPath

Comparison of the Efficacy of Telerehabilitation and In-person Rehabilitation Based on Wearable Devices After ACLR Surgery: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Registration Number
NCT06327555
Lead Sponsor
Peking University Third Hospital
Brief Summary

Purpose: Investigate whether telerehabilitation based on wearable devices is clinically as effective as in-person rehabilitation for ACLR patients.

Subjects: 164 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent ACLR. Design: A mixed-block randomization method was used to randomly assign participants to two groups: the telerehabilitation group and the in-person rehabilitation group, with a 50% probability of assignment to each group. All participants received standard postoperative rehabilitation training with identical content. The telerehabilitation group received postoperative telerehabilitation guidance via software and sensors. The in-person rehabilitation group received therapist-administered treatment with three rehabilitation sessions per week. All participants underwent regular follow-ups (1 day preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively).

Primary outcome measure: The primary outcome measure was the Lysholm score. Secondary outcome measures included the IKDC score, Tegner Activity Scale, SF-36 questionnaire, VAS score, and isokinetic muscle strength of the knee joint.

Detailed Description

Purpose: Investigate whether telerehabilitation based on wearable devices is clinically as effective as in-person rehabilitation for ACLR patients.

Subjects: Participants: This study recruited 164 participants (aged ≥18 years) undergoing ACLRsurgery;

Inclusion criteria:

(1) Age range 18-60 years; (2) First-time unilateral ACLR surgery or ACLR combined with meniscus resection surgery; (3) No other lower limb joint injuries at the same time; (4) Possession of an internet-connected mobile device capable of using a mobile application; (5) Alert and oriented, with no communication impairments; Exclusion Criteria: (1) Patients undergoing revision surgery; (2) Patients who have previously undergone other lower limb surgeries; (3) Patients scheduled for another lower limb surgery within the next 6 months; (4) Patients with concomitant knee ligament injuries or severe structural damage beyond meniscal tears; (5) Patients with other comorbidities that may interfere with rehabilitation exercises; (6) Patients undergoing acute-phase surgery; (7)Patients undergoing acute surgery.

Protocol: Participants were randomly assigned to two groups using a mixed-block randomization method: the telerehabilitation group and the in-person rehabilitation group. The allocation probability for both groups was 50%. All participants received routine outpatient diagnosis and treatment. Postoperative rehabilitation training used a standardized postoperative rehabilitation training protocol with identical content. The telerehabilitation group received postoperative telerehabilitation guidance via software and sensors. The in-person rehabilitation group received three face-to-face rehabilitation sessions per week. All participants underwent regular follow-ups (1 day preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively).

Primary outcome measure: The primary outcome measure was the Lysholm score. Secondary outcome measures included the IKDC score, Tegner Activity Scale, SF-36 questionnaire, VAS score, isokinetic muscle strength of the knee joint, and muscle strength symmetry.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
164
Inclusion Criteria

(1) Age range 18-60 years; (2) First-time unilateral ACLR surgery or ACLR combined with meniscus resection surgery; (3) No other lower limb joint injuries at the same time; (4) Possession of an internet-connected mobile device capable of using a mobile application; (5) Alert and oriented, with no communication impairments;

Exclusion Criteria

(1) Patients undergoing revision surgery; (2) Patients who have previously undergone other lower limb surgeries; (3) Patients scheduled for another lower limb surgery within the next 6 months; (4) Patients with concomitant knee ligament injuries or severe structural damage beyond meniscal tears; (5) Patients with other comorbidities that may interfere with rehabilitation exercises; (6) Patients undergoing acute-phase surgery; (7)Patients undergoing acute surgery.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Lysholm scoreFrom before ACLR surgery to 6 months post-surgery.

Used to assess knee joint function, with a score range of 0-100, where a higher score indicates better knee joint function.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Peak torque and symmetry of knee flexors and extensorsFrom before ACLR surgery to 6 months after surgery.

Used to assess knee muscle strength

IKDC scoreFrom before ACLR surgery to 6 months post-surgery.

Used to assess knee joint function, with a score range of 0-100. The higher the score, the better the knee joint function.

Tegner scoreFrom before ACLR surgery to 6 months post-surgery.

Used to assess motor function. The range is 0-10, with higher scores indicating better knee function.

VAS scoreFrom before ACLR surgery to 6 months after surgery.

Used to assess pain levels. The range is 0-10, with higher scores indicating higher pain levels.

Short Form-36 Health Survey(SF-36)From before ACLR surgery to 6 months post-surgery.

Used to assess quality of life. There are 9 subscales, each with a score range of 0-100, with higher scores indicating better knee function.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

quan Jian Wang

🇨🇳

Beijing, Beijing, China

quan Jian Wang
🇨🇳Beijing, Beijing, China
quan J Wang, M.D.
Contact
13801076267
wjqsportsmed@163.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.