MedPath

Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) Study

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Glaucoma
Interventions
Procedure: Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C
Procedure: Baerveldt implant
Registration Number
NCT00306852
Lead Sponsor
University of Miami
Brief Summary

The purpose of the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) Study is to compare the safety and efficacy of nonvalved tube shunt surgery to trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in patients with previous ocular surgery.

Detailed Description

Glaucoma surgery is performed when further intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction is needed despite the use of maximum tolerated medical therapy and appropriate laser treatment. Trabeculectomy is generally used as the initial incisional surgical procedure in managing glaucoma. However, eyes in which trabeculectomy has failed are at greater risk of failure with subsequent filtering surgery. Wound modulation with antifibrotic agents, like mitomycin C (MMC) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), has been shown to increase the success rate of trabeculectomy in eyes that have undergone previous ocular surgery. Although antifibrotic agents have increased the likelihood of IOP control following filtering surgery, they have also increased the risk of complications. The prevalence of bleb leaks, bleb-related infections, and bleb dysesthesia associated with a perilimbal filtering bleb suggests the need to consider alternatives. Tube shunts (or glaucoma drainage implants) offer an alternative to trabeculectomy in the surgical management of glaucoma, and these devices have been growing in popularity in recent years.

Practice patterns vary in the surgical management of glaucoma in eyes with previous ocular surgery. In 1996, Chen and colleagues conducted an anonymous survey of members of the American Glaucoma Society (AGS) and Japanese Glaucoma Society (JGS) to evaluate use of antifibrotic agents and tube shunts. The survey presented ten clinical situations requiring glaucoma surgical intervention. The majority of respondents (59-83%) preferred trabeculectomy with MMC for the clinical scenarios involving prior ocular surgery, although many of those surveyed elected to use a tube shunt, trabeculectomy with 5-FU, or trabeculectomy without an antifibrotic agent. In 2002, Joshi and associates re-administered the same survey to members of the AGS. Respondents still favored trabeculectomy with MMC, but the percentage usage of tube shunts had significantly increased. The greatest practice pattern shift was observed in patients with previous cataract and glaucoma surgery. In particular, selection of tube shunts as the preferred surgical approach increased from 7% to 22% in eyes with prior trabeculectomy, and increased from 8% to 22% in eyes with prior extracapsular or intracapsular cataract extraction.

The lack of consensus among glaucoma surgeons regarding the use of tube shunts or trabeculectomy with an antifibrotic agent in eyes that have had prior cataract or glaucoma surgery likely relates to the fact that available clinical data has not shown one surgical procedure to be superior to the other. Similar surgical results have been reported with both glaucoma procedures in eyes with aphakia/pseudophakia and failed filters when studied separately. Success rates have ranged from 50% to 88% for tube shunts, and 48% to 86% for filtering surgery with an antifibrotic agent in case series studying aphakic/pseudophakic eyes. Success rates have ranged from 44% to 88% for tube shunts, and 61% to 100% for 5-FU and MMC trabeculectomy in eyes with failed filters. Comparable rates of severe complications have also been reported with tube shunt surgery and trabeculectomy with an adjunctive antifibrotic agent.

The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) Study was designed to prospectively compare the safety and efficacy of nonvalved tube shunt surgery and trabeculectomy with MMC. Patients with uncontrolled glaucoma who had prior cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation and/or failed filtering surgery were enrolled in this multicenter clinical trial and randomized to placement of a 350 Baerveldt glaucoma implant (Advanced Medical Optics, Irvine, CA) or trabeculectomy with MMC (0.4 mg/ml for 4 minutes). The goal of this investigator initiated trial is to provide information that will assist in surgical decision-making in similar patient groups.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
212
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 18 to 85 years
  • Intraocular pressure greater than or equal to 18 mm Hg and less than or equal to 40 mm Hg
  • Previous trabeculectomy, cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation, or both
Exclusion Criteria
  • Unwilling or unable to give consent, unwilling to accept randomization, or unable to return for scheduled protocol visits
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • No light perception vision
  • Active iris neovascularization or active proliferative retinopathy
  • Iridocorneal endothelial syndrome
  • Epithelial or fibrous downgrowth
  • Aphakia
  • Vitreous in the anterior chamber for which a vitrectomy is anticipated
  • Chronic or recurrent uveitis
  • Severe posterior blepharitis
  • Unwilling to discontinue contact lens use after surgery
  • Previous cyclodestructive procedure, scleral buckling procedure, or presence of silicone oil
  • Conjunctival scarring precluding a trabeculectomy superiorly
  • Need for glaucoma surgery combined with other ocular procedures (eg cataract surgery, penetrating keratoplasty, or retinal surgery) or anticipated need for additional ocular surgery

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
TrabeculectomyTrabeculectomy with mitomycin CTrabeculectomy with mitomycin C
ImplantBaerveldt implantBaerveldt Implant
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Intraocular PressureBaseline to 5 years

The data value from the Baseline visit and 5 year follow-up visit were combined. Specifically, values were calculated by subtracting the 5 Year Intraocular Pressure from the Baseline Intraocular Pressure.

Rate of Complications5 years

Complications associated with both surgical procedures

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Visual Acuity5 years

Visual acuity was measured by the total number of letters read (correctly) using a ETDRS eye chart

Reoperations for Glaucoma5 years

Reoperations for glaucoma was defined as additional glaucoma surgery requiring a return to the operating room.

Need for Supplemental Medical Therapy5 years

The number of supplemental glaucoma medications required in the Implant Group and Trabeculectomy Group at 5 years

Failure Rate5 years

Failure was prospectively defined as IOP greater than 21 mm Hg or less than 20 percent reduction below baseline on 2 consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months, IOP less than or equal to 5 mm Hg on 2 consecutive follow-up visits after 3 months, re-operation for glaucoma, or loss of light perception vision.

Trial Locations

Locations (17)

Loyola University

🇺🇸

Maywood, Illinois, United States

University of Florida

🇺🇸

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Medical University of South Carolina

🇺🇸

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

University of Virginia

🇺🇸

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

University of Southern California

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Scripps Clinic

🇺🇸

La Jolla, California, United States

New York Eye and Ear Infirmary

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

St. Louis University

🇺🇸

St. Louis, Missouri, United States

University of Wisconsin

🇺🇸

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Moorfields Eye Hospital

🇬🇧

London, United Kingdom

Bascom Palmer Eye Institute

🇺🇸

Miami, Florida, United States

Duke University

🇺🇸

Durham, North Carolina, United States

University of California Davis

🇺🇸

Sacramento, California, United States

Indiana University

🇺🇸

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

University of Texas Houston

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

University of Oklahoma

🇺🇸

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Medical College of Wisconsin

🇺🇸

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath