Influence of Suture Type on Emergency Midline Laparotomy Closure
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Evisceration
研究概览
简要总结
There is no clear recommendation in international guidelines regarding the type of suture to be used for closing emergency midline laparotomies. It is recommended to follow the same principles as in elective surgery, thus performing the closure with a continuous suture of slowly absorbable monofilament 2-0 with small-bites technique. Currently, there are several slowly absorbable sutures available on the market, and our center uses two: PDS® and Monomax®. These two sutures are currently used interchangeably at our institution based on the preferences of each surgeon.
Objective: study whether there are differences between these two sutures in the closure of emergency midline laparotomy.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •>18 years old, patients undergoing emergency midline laparotomy by the General Surgery Department.
排除标准
- •<18 years old, previous midline laparotomy
研究组 & 干预措施
PDS
Closure emergency laparotomy using PDS 2/0 small bites
干预措施: PDS 2/0 vs Monomax 2/0 (Procedure)
Monomax
Closure emergency laparotomy using Monomax 2/0 small bites
干预措施: PDS 2/0 vs Monomax 2/0 (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
Evisceration
时间窗: 1 month
Rate of evisceration
次要结局
- Wound complication(1 month)
- Incisional hernia(1 year)
研究者
Julen Ramon Rodríguez
Principal Investigator
University Hospital of the Nuestra Señora de Candelaria