Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03886792
NCT03886792
Unknown
Not Applicable

A Home-Based Biofeedback Program to Augment Recovery After Perinatal Brachial Plexus Injury

Chapman University1 site in 1 country24 target enrollmentFebruary 25, 2019

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Brachial Plexus Palsy
Sponsor
Chapman University
Enrollment
24
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in the integral of biceps brachii muscle activation post-intervention
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Infants who sustain an injury to the brachial plexus in the perinatal period are at high-risk for long-term neuromuscular deficits and prehensile dysfunction. If recovery is delayed because of slow axonal regrowth, disuse atrophy and secondary musculoskeletal deficits may develop. The investigators' hypothesis is that early, intensive intervention designed to foster muscle activation is essential to optimize outcomes after brachial plexus injury and may supplement rehabilitation and microsurgery. This proposal targets infants who are non-surgical candidates. Yet, future studies will examine whether the investigators' experimental intervention can hasten recovery from microsurgery and will examine which post-operative time-point is best to employ it. The investigators' intervention shows promise to increase muscle activation and improve arm function in infants with brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) through contingent reinforcement based on a pilot study.

Detailed Description

The investigator's study objectives are to (1) test the feasibility of a parent-lead in-home 2-week intervention for infants with BPBP; and (2) determine the effect size for the primary outcome measure(s) in preparation for a future definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT). In this feasibility RCT, the investigators will compare two in-home interventions in 3 to 12-month-old infants with upper trunk BPBP; n=12 per group: (1) experimental; and (2) dose-equivalent active control. For the experimental intervention, infants will trigger a musical toy to move and play via biceps contraction above a preset individual threshold. For the control intervention, toys will be available to play with, yet, there will be no reinforcement for biceps activation.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 25, 2019
End Date
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age of 3 to 12 months with upper trunk brachial plexus birth palsy confirmed by an attending Hand and Upper Extremity Surgeon;
  • Full-term at birth;
  • A minimum score of '1' (0-7 scale) in elbow flexion of affected arm (isometric contraction) based on the Active Movement Scale (AMS);
  • Score ≥ 25th percentile on the motor subtest of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition (BSITD-III®);
  • Ability to sustain attention/arousal for a 10 minute training period based on criteria from the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment for an awake-alert state.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Visual/auditory deficits;
  • Nerve repair/shoulder surgery;
  • Excessive crying during session(s);
  • Shoulder, elbow, or wrist joint contractures \> 20° in the affected arm;
  • An inability to trigger the musical-toy to play at baseline.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in the integral of biceps brachii muscle activation post-intervention

Time Frame: Baseline, Immediately post-intervention, 1-month post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention

Change in the magnitude of biceps muscle activation (Volts x time) post-intervention

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in day-long arm activity based on the resultant acceleration (ms*m/s2)(Baseline, Immediately post-intervention, 1-month post-intervention, 3-months post-intervention)
  • Parent Perception Questionnaire to examine feasibility of parent-run intervention - self designed(Immediately post-intervention)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials