Photobiomodulation for Controlling Pre-Local Anesthetic Injection Pain
- Conditions
- Fear Needles
- Interventions
- Device: PhotobiomodulationDevice: Photobiomodulation simulation
- Registration Number
- NCT06128590
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Nove de Julho
- Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to assess whether pre-anesthetic photobiomodulation (PBM) can effectively reduce needle puncture pain and enhance the efficiency of local anesthesia. In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 50 participants were included. The control group underwent the standard anesthetic procedure, while the experimental group received the application of an infrared laser (100mW at 808nm, 8J at a single point) immediately before anesthesia, at the site of the intended needle puncture. Both groups underwent the same anesthetic procedure, administered by the same operator. The outcome evaluator and the patient were blind to the FBM application. The primary outcome of the study focused on pain experienced at the time of needle insertion, assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during the needle's introduction. Secondary outcomes encompassed anxiety levels, measured using the Beck questionnaire, anesthetic onset time determined through the electric pulp test, the number of anesthetics required for the procedure, and the necessity for supplementary anesthesia.
- Detailed Description
Dental fear and phobia are widespread worldwide, with local anesthesia being one of the procedures that patients fear the most. To alleviate the pain associated with needle insertion and the need for repeat procedures, various complementary therapies have been introduced. However, to date, there is no established protocol for this intervention. The objective of this study is to assess whether pre-anesthetic photobiomodulation (PBM) can effectively reduce needle puncture pain and enhance the efficiency of local anesthesia. In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 50 participants were included. The control group underwent the standard anesthetic procedure, while the experimental group received the application of an infrared laser (100mW at 808nm, 8J at a single point) immediately before anesthesia, at the site of the intended needle puncture. Both groups underwent the same anesthetic procedure, administered by the same operator. The outcome evaluator and the patient were blind to the FBM application. The primary outcome of the study focused on pain experienced at the time of needle insertion, assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during the needle's introduction. Secondary outcomes encompassed anxiety levels, measured using the Beck questionnaire, anesthetic onset time determined through the electric pulp test, the number of anesthetics required for the procedure, and the necessity for supplementary anesthesia. Categorical variables will be presented as absolute and relative frequencies and compared using the Pearson chi-squared test, likelihood ratio test, or Fisher's exact test. Quantitative variables will be assessed for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Outcome variables will be presented as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range (IQR) and compared using the Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test. Variables measured under multiple conditions will be compared using analysis of variance for repeated measures. A significance level of P \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
- From 18 to 60 years old
- Both genders
- Without comorbidities
- Who required pterygomandibular anaesthesia for a dental procedure.
- Any sign of pain or inflammation at the puncture site (e.g. presence of pericoronaritis)
- Active periodontitis/gingivitis
- Use of a pacemaker
- Use of prostheses, fixed metal appliances
- Using anti-inflammatory, analgesic or corticosteroid therapy for less than 1 week.
- Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women
- Need to use a local anaesthetic other than Mepivacaine with vasoconstrictor (anaesthetic of choice for the study)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Control: Laser Sham (Group B) Photobiomodulation simulation The participants will be treated in the same way as in group A. The person responsible for applying the PBM will simulate the irradiations by positioning the device in the same place as described for the experimental group, but the equipment will be switched off. So that the participant does not identify the group to which they belong, the device's activation sound (beep) will be simulated by the device itself, which makes the beep sound by pressing the activation button only once. After this, pterygomandibular anesthesia will be carried out in the same way. Experimental: Photobiomodulation (Group A) Photobiomodulation Participants will receive photobiomodulation therapy immediately before local anesthesia, in the same place where the puncture will be performed for pterygomandibular anesthesia. Experimental: Photobiomodulation (Group A) Mepivacaine hydrochloride in combination with epinephrine Participants will receive photobiomodulation therapy immediately before local anesthesia, in the same place where the puncture will be performed for pterygomandibular anesthesia. Control: Laser Sham (Group B) Mepivacaine hydrochloride in combination with epinephrine The participants will be treated in the same way as in group A. The person responsible for applying the PBM will simulate the irradiations by positioning the device in the same place as described for the experimental group, but the equipment will be switched off. So that the participant does not identify the group to which they belong, the device's activation sound (beep) will be simulated by the device itself, which makes the beep sound by pressing the activation button only once. After this, pterygomandibular anesthesia will be carried out in the same way.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain assessment Immediately After anesthesia It will be carried out as follows: the healthcare professional asks the patient to select a point on a line 10cm long, drawn between two extremities to express the intensity of the pain. Patients will be asked to rate "current" pain intensity or, in other cases, pain intensity "in the last 24 hours". The VAS is a simple-to-use assessment tool that does not require sophisticated equipment. It is also highly sensitive in detecting the effects of treatment, and its results can be analyzed using parametric tests. In this study, a plastic band was made for all patients,
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assessment of blood pressure 10 minutes after anesthesia A manual sphygmomanometer was used, and assessed by the same professional.
Blood oxygen saturation level 10 minutes after anesthesia For this purpose, digital oximeter were used, and assessed by the same professional.
Suplementar anesthesia Immediately after procedure Number of anesthetic tubets needed for anesthetic supplementation during the procedure was counted
Anxiety assessment using Beck's questionnaire Immediately After anesthesia Anxiety analyses will be carried out using the BAI (by Beck, Epstein, Brown \& Steer, 1988), adapted and validated for Brazil by Cunha (2001), which will be applied before and after treatment.
The BAI is a multiple-choice questionnaire containing 21 questions about common anxiety symptoms. The score ranges from 0 to 63, and is classified as minimal anxiety (score: 0-10), mild anxiety (score: 11-20), moderate anxiety (score: 21-30) and severe anxiety (score: 31-63). The questionnaire will be answered by the participants themselves, who will read the questions and answer them manually before starting the research and after the end of the treatment. At the end of the treatment, the score obtained will be calculated and applied to the results collection form.Pterygomandibular technique success rate Immediately After procedure The anesthetic success rate will be calculated by counting the number of times the procedure has been effective, i.e. if 30 minutes after anesthesia, the electrical test does not determine a mark of 50 on the display, this means that the anesthetic technique has failed. Even if the patient reports that the tissues are anesthetized, for complete pterygomandibular anesthesia, it is necessary to anesthetize the pulp, the lingual region, the vestibular region and the corresponding lower lip. If there is no complete anesthesia, this patient will be considered a "failure of anesthesia", but the patient will not be excluded from the study, since the main outcome of pain has already been collected without interference.
Latency time 30 minutes after anesthesia To establish a standard, the tests will be carried out on permanent premolars, with normal reaction scales ranging from 20 to 50. For convenience in terms of ease of visualization, the first lower premolar was preferably chosen; if the element was absent, it was carried out on the second lower premolar. Data was collected before treatment and at 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes after anaesthesia, timed using a digital stopwatch on a mobile phone.
The thermal test will be carried out before the procedure to double-check the pulp vitality of the elements, as stated in the literature.The cold test will be carried out with cotton wool on the buccal surface of the first premolar or the same as the electrical test, for 15 seconds or until the patient indicates that they feel sensitivity.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Anna Carolina R.T. Horliana
🇧🇷São Paulo, SP, Brazil