Effects of Warm & Cold Therapy with Modified Thermoelectric Element Tourniquet application on Pain, Stress, Blood Flow and Satisfaction During Intravenous injection in Hospital Patients
试验速览
- 阶段
- Unknown
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 59
研究概览
简要总结
The results of this study are as follows. Hypothesis 1 of Hypothesis 1: “There will be a difference in pain between the experimental group to which warm and cold therapy with M-TEE Tourniquet was applied during intravenous injection and the control group to which only M-TEE Tourniquet was applied.” It appeared to be present and was supported (F=3.382, p<.05). 2nd hypothesis to 1st hypothesis: “There will be differences in pain between the experimental group to which heat therapy and cold therapy with M-TEE Tourniquet were applied and the control group to which only M-TEE Tourniquet was applied during intravenous injection.” Observed oxygen saturation and pulse rate was rejected as there was no difference (F=0.701, p>.05) (F=0.520, p>.05) 2nd hypothesis: “There will be a difference in perceived stress between the experimental group that received warm and cold therapy with M-TEE Tourniquet during intravenous injection and the control group that only applied M-TEE Tourniquet.” (F=2.359, p>.05). 3rd Hypothesis: During intravenous injection, there will be a difference in blood flow between the experimental group to which hot and cold therapy with M-TEE Tourniquet was applied and the control group to which only M-TEE Tourniquet was applied.” There was no difference in blood flow (F=2.165, p>.05) ( F=0.702, p>.05). However, as a result of comparing the difference in blood flow before and after the application of M-TEE Tourniquet, the warm therapy group showed a significant difference compared to the cold therapy group (F=5.991, P<.05). In addition, as a result of analyzing the changes in venous blood flow before and after the experimental treatment through repeated measures ANOVA, there was a significant difference in the interaction between time and group (F=5.991, p=.004), which was partially supported. Hypothesis 4: "There will be a difference in subject satisfaction between the warm therapy group, cold therapy group applied with M-TEE Tourniquet during intravenous injection, and the control group with only M-TEE Tourniquet applied." 3.258, p<.05). Hypothesis 5: “Satisfaction with M-TEE Tourniquet for patients who performed intravenous injection after applying warm and cold therapy with M-TEE Tourniquet during intravenous injection, and intravenous injection practitioners who performed intravenous injection with only M-TEE Touniquet will have a difference.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20(Year) 至 65(Year)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Adults receiving intravenous injections among inpatients
- •1. An adult aged 20 or older and 65 or younger who accepted the participation after hearing the explanation about this study and can communicate
- •2. Those who have experienced intravenous injection within 6 months
- •3. prospective intravenous injection
排除标准
- •1.Those who perform other treatments to relieve pain during intravenous injection
- •2. Persons with mental illness who have difficulty making judgments
- •3. Those with hypersensitivity to hot and cold
- •4. Those who are taking medications that can affect pain and stress