MedPath

Development of the Palate in Bilateral Orofacial Cleft Newborns One Year After Early Neonatal Cheiloplasty

Conditions
Cleft Palate
Cleft Lip
Cleft Lip, Bilateral
Cleft Lip and Palate
Interventions
Procedure: Early neonatal cheiloplasty
Registration Number
NCT03839290
Lead Sponsor
Charles University, Czech Republic
Brief Summary

Early neonatal cheiloplasty is modified surgery protocol applied in the first week of newborn's life used for treating orofacial cleft patients. This prospective study analyzes the effects of early neonatal cheiloplasty on the growth and development of maxilla and palate during the observed period of one year.

Detailed Description

Multidisciplinary treatment of patients with orofacial clefts begins immediately after birth. The first surgical procedure is early neonatal cheiloplasty applied in the first week of the newborn's life, which has been practiced in the Czech Republic for many years. It is a popular parental choice and has a lot of benefits compared to classic cheiloplasty performed between 3-6 months. Unrestricted growth of jaws is essential for the successful therapy of aesthetics and functions. Although there are known a lot of benefits to this surgery, its influence on facial growth is still being studied.

The methodology of this study is based on modern three-dimensional imaging methods and will be evaluated by classic and geometric morphometric analysis of virtual dental models. The existing database includes 137 virtual dental casts (complete and incomplete bilateral or unilateral cleft lip and palate).

The main aim is to verify that the effects of early neonatal cheiloplasty on the facial or palatal growth are minimal in affected individuals and therefore the subsequent development of these structures can be predicted at a later age. Other goals are to evaluate palatal morphology before and one year after early neonatal cheiloplasty, to assess growth of maxilla and palate using classic and geometric morphometry, to assess morphological differences between cleft types and to compare the results with previously published data of neonates operated by later operation protocol and noncleft control groups.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
137
Inclusion Criteria
  • Nonsyndromic orofacial cleft
  • Czech origin
  • Operated by the same surgeon
  • Following same surgery protocol (modified Veau surgery protocol)
  • Excellent body temperature, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, heart function
  • Performing of early neonatal cheiloplasty
Exclusion Criteria
  • Poor health
  • Syndromic orofacial cleft
  • Operated by later operation protocol (3-6 months)
  • Non-Czech origin

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Bilateral cleft lip and palate patientsEarly neonatal cheiloplastyNewborns with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (cBCLP) and bilateral cleft lip and palate with tissue bridges (BCLP + B) analyzed one year after neonatal cheiloplasty
Unilateral cleft lip and palate patientsEarly neonatal cheiloplastyNewborns with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (cUCLP) and unilateral cleft lip and palate with tissue bridges (UCLP + B) analyzed one year after neonatal cheiloplasty
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Growth changes during the first year of lifeT0 before early neonatal cheiloplasty (5 ± 5 days) and T1 before palatoplasty (12 ± 6 months).

Analysis of palatal growth changes in individuals with orofacial clefts after neonatal cheiloplasty (5 ± 5 days) and before palatoplasty (12 ± 6 months).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of the palatal growth in orofacial cleft patients1 year

Comparison of the growth of the palate in complete and incomplete cleft patients

Differences between cleft types1 year

Morphological differences between complete and incomplete cleft types

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Lenka Jaklová

🇨🇿

Praha, Czech Republic, Czechia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath